It Takes Two: A Gripping Lens Of Life, Love and Loss

Two

Two Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

3

In our life’s journey, it’s safe to say that we may likely get to experience the gamut of relational dynamics. Some may be genuine, some may be deemed unhealthy or harmful; but more often than not; they are largely played out behind closed doors, where couples may hide their truth from the outside world for privacy’s sake, or in deeper cases, to protect the masks they portray to the outside world.

But in the case of playwright Jim Cartwright, his masterful take on the complexity of human relationships, his play aptly entitled ‘Two’, turns the ‘behind-closed-doors’ theory on its head – instead having the audience focus on the fractured relationship between a boisterous, bickering landlord and his counterpart, a landlady – both publicans of a working- class Northern English pub. Tasking us ‘head-first’ with a particular duty – of piecing together the ‘why’s’ behind the ‘cocktail of cracks’ we are witnessing in their relationship. Is it largely due to infidelity? Or is it simply a love/hate relationship where both parties have simply outgrown one another?

But wait — that is not all. For Cartwright dared to take it one step further, and distract us from the issue at hand; perhaps to set the record straight. Setting this couple’s woes aside, we remain glued to this pub setting, and instead are greeted by a revolving door of 14 other pub patrons (all played to perfection by the show’s only 2 leads), where we get to experience the gamut of different relationship dynamics, and how both genders choose to survive within walls of light vs shade; of the highest-of-highs, to the woest-of-woes. There are comedic moments, as well as grimmer ones that are at times, harder to bear witness to.

The difference in this play? Is that surprisingly, BOTH genders are shown in these scenes to be equally as lustful, resilient, bittersweet, deeply troubled and lonely. Posing a question to us about the power play in romantic relationships. Do they go both ways? Are there indeed two sides to the coin? And if so; can both sexes sometimes be deemed equally good or bad, when it comes to relationships?

As we start to question this, Cartwright cleverly places us back into the first dynamic – the blaring energy of the landlord and landlady, to piece together whether there is any hope left in their fractured relationship.

 

Speaking of which, the landlord, played by the very charismatic Chris Mentor, is simply mesmerising as he is so nuanced in every character he plays. From a sensitive 7 year old boy, to a damaged husband, to a widower tenderly describing his grief. And yet, his presence is unwavering and strong; remaining confident and courageous enough to tell stories that range from deeply funny to deeply broken. From his seamless performance, it is clear why Chris Mentor was cast in this demanding lead role.

As the Landlady, Angelique Pascoe is exquisite, and her energy of ferocity perfectly matched the role required to play the landlord’s counterpart. Every part she played had the bite and the stacks of humour needed to play such complex female characters, many who owned difficult backgrounds and stories not for the faint-hearted. But she conquered each tale with aplomb, as if it spoke to her heart, completely.

Cartwright’s powerful play ‘Two’, is brilliantly directed by Natasha Boyd, who has perfected in her actors the precise bridging of comedy vs pathos needed to keep us hooked; gripping us in every scene with a spectrum of human emotion and an unbridled energy that pulls no punches. Where in a span of 80 minutes, the audience is fully immersed in a fly-on-the-wall experience of witnessing a vivid cross-section of complex characters come to life inside the closed door of a pub. Where we can bear witness to what it truly means to be human in our most challenging moments.

And lastly, I feel it fitting to mention the incredible set design crew that brought this little English pub to life. From the detailed 80”s lighting fixtures to the bright and jolly jukebox. From the old wooden bar and classic dartboard to the colourful wall-to-wall postered ads all in their fine 80’s form. From every angle, not one detail was left out — even creating a makeshift hallway with paintings off one side of the stage, bringing the aspect of pure realism to the audience, whichever way their eyes looked.

All this, was what indeed made STAG’s ‘Two’ a dramatic experience like no other, filled with a scope of comedy, grit, storytelling and a sum of surprises – making this a winning night out at the theatre.

To book tickets to Two, please visit https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1528222.

Photographer: Dave Swann

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons: When Silence Becomes the Story

Feature-Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons by Sam Steiner

What happens when the simple act of speaking freely is stripped away? Rational Animals is bringing this thought-provoking work to Newcastle audiences. The production’s director shares how movement, silence and minimal staging become powerful storytelling tools in their hands.

About The Production – Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons by Sam Steiner

What is this production about?

For me, this production is about language, freedom and control. It explores what happens when something as simple as being able to speak freely is taken away, and how that begins to affect our relationships, choices and sense of self.

What is challenging about bringing this script to life?

The biggest challenge has been making the many scene changes and shifts in time feel seamless. With each change, the characters’ intentions, tone, mood and body language shift too. There is a lot happening beneath what can appear to be very simple conversations, so finding a way to communicate those changes clearly, while keeping the pace and rhythm of the production, has been a real challenge.

What sort of person is going to love this show?

I think anyone who enjoys theatre that makes you think, question things and notice the little details will love this show. You don’t need to know anything about politics or censorship to connect with it. At its heart, it’s still a very human story about two people trying to understand each other, communicate and stay connected.

What will the audience be thinking about on the drive home after this show?

Hopefully, they’ll be thinking about how much freedom they actually have in the words they use every day. What would happen if we couldn’t say what we wanted to say? And how would that change the way we communicate, connect and understand one another?

What is going to surprise people about this production?

The movement, repetition, lighting, silence and minimal set all become part of the storytelling. What initially looks like a simple conversation between two people gradually becomes something much bigger. I think audiences will be surprised by how much can be communicated through what is not said.

A heartfelt thank you for sharing the intricate work behind bringing Steiner’s script to life, particularly the challenge of making those many shifts in time feel seamless. For those who love theatre that rewards attention to detail and lingers in the mind long after the curtain falls, tickets are available through TryBooking.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Cleopatra & Antony

Cleopatra & Antony

Cleopatra & Antony Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

2

With a simple reframe, the Melbourne Shakespeare Company’s ‘Cleopatra & Antony’ signals a deviation from the norm long before curtains up. Shakespeare’s original play centres the Roman general Mark Antony, but this production flips the script to spotlight his infamous beau, the Egyptian queen Cleopatra.

Shakespeare’s ‘Antony & Cleopatra’ follows the powerful relationship between Cleopatra and Mark Antony and their tragic demise as casualties of the crowning Roman Empire. The tragedy is one of Shakespeare’s more ambitious works, notorious for its numerous scenes spanning scores of characters, relationships and locales. On paper, it’s a bit of a slog, so it’s the direction that makes or breaks this production.

The Melbourne Shakespeare Company’s adaptation sat dreamlike between traditional and contemporary. On stage, the set (designed by Eloise Kent) was pared back, with organic splays of linen, stone and smoke; pale fawns and ochres evoking a dusky Mediterranean villa.

 

Crazy, stupid love is the one luxury Cleopatra and Antony can’t afford; their chaotic affair begets a doubly chaotic state of affairs. Sonya Suares directs ‘Cleopatra & Antony’ with that restless, impulsive passion which grated at times to watch, but only for its bitter truth. That’s where tragedy lives, in the oh-so-avoidable. We’re meant to shake our heads at the foolishness of these characters because we aren’t the fools in love (until we are).

Akina Edmond’s Cleopatra and Louis Lucente’s Antony were forces in their own right and all the more powerful together. Intense, playful and hotblooded, the two moved as if in orbit and fed off each other’s boundless energy until their final devastating moments. Supported by strong characters from Tsungirai Wachenuka’s Charmian to Jennifer Vuletic’s Agrippa, Laura Iris Hill’s Enobarbus and the multifaceted ensemble, the chemistry on stage was palpable.

I appreciated the intention to make the content more digestible, but I’m unsure if Charmian’s metatextual narration answered this adaptation’s purpose. The play stretches itself across so many histories and contexts that I wonder what—if any—method there would be to compensate for gaps in audience knowledge. For a lesser-known play, it struggles to reap the benefits of contemporary direction. Strip off the frills, let us relish in the madness.

I’m similarly undecided if anything new was added for me in the reframing of Cleopatra’s role, though I will say this: there’s a power in perception and Cleopatra is one of history’s most misunderstood figures. Even if the story remained the same, the Melbourne Shakespeare Company’s adaptation extends an invitation to its audience to recontextualise a previously fixed character, wielding the transformative power of narration to ask a critical question: who is telling the story?

To book tickets to Cleopatra & Antony, please visit https://www.melbourneshakespeare.com/cleopatra-and-antony.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

After Dinner

After Dinner

After Dinner Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

2

After Dinner took us back to the 1980s with decor, fashion, black stockings and not a mobile phone in sight. The scene was set in a dining/entertainment venue with apricot tablecloths and chairs with touches of gold. With echoes of the television series, Kath and Kim and a little of The Office, the cast threw themselves into a by-gone era of dancing and romancing.

The audience first meets Gordon played by Oliver Wilson. He is a world-weary and sad man in a baggy 1980s suit recently separated from his wife. As he waits for two office colleagues, two women appear at a nearby table. Dympie played by Chantal Harrison enters with a classic 1980s side ponytail and wearing a blue satin dress and stockings. Paula, played by Noa Besser, dressed in what appears to be a genuine padded 1980s ensemble in purple is Dympie’s friend. Immediately it appears that Dympie is one of those people where her life is ‘my way or the highway’. Having no real social intelligence, she rearranges the table to suit her needs. Paula wants to be up close to the band but Dympie is having none of that and chooses a table at the back. Paula reluctantly gives in. They are absolute opposites.

Later, another colleague, Monica, played by Claire Gandy, joins as a grieving widow. At first, social etiquette tries to skirt around death with some funny moments and comments during an awkward conversation. Claire plays the role with enthusiasm and great comedic timing. We are there for her and the audience responded laughing at the intimate and embarrassing details of a mundane marriage. Her two colleagues listen in horror with Dympie shutting down the conversation only focusing on her hunger.

 

There are funny moments during ordering dinner as the throwback to 1980s menus and drinks is explained. All agree that they only order a carafe of white wine, either dry or not too sweet as they haven’t a clue. Claire unravels at the table with Gordon overhearing the drama. He is joined by his colleague Stephen, played convincingly by Nicholas Berthold. Stephen is looking for women and is a clichéd 1980s banker and ‘women’s man’. The outpouring of men’s issues between Gordon and Stephen is funny and revealing and acted with suitable embarrassment regarding ‘men’s talk’.

As the evening develops, in one of the best scenes of the play, Claire Gandy portrays the most genuine, angry and frustrated woman who is all pathos and suppression, seeking answers about wasting her life. She reveals all in a hilarious authentic monologue. The men become involved and with great comedic timing we see the fumbling and bumbling of both sexes.

With 1980s music reminiscent of a pub band in the background, the third male colleague never appearing and the desperate need for any of them to pair off, the conversations are both funny and bittersweet. Not one person was scrolling, trolling or texting, it was all about the language and social comments about dating, dancing and finding love.

To book tickets to After Dinner, please visit https://lanecovetheatrecompany.com.au/.

Photographer: Jim Crew, Lane Cove Creative Photography

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Subscribe to What's The Show

Reviews, show news and what is on, straight to your inbox.