Jane “Meta” Austen

The Watsons

The Watsons Rating

Click if you liked this article

2

This is not your typical Jane Austen show. This is meta chaos.

Act I is what you would expect from anything attached to Jane Austen and the regency era; talks of marriage for both love and gain, a ball (complete with dance), proper introductions being made, and fast proposals. But what happens when the author inserts herself into the story and the characters rebel? Act II is a chaotic ride answering just that … and then some.

Please note I am calling the actors and actresses “performers” to avoid any unintentional mis-gendering.

The theatre boasts 120 seats, and at the time of the show starting, I could only spot four empty seats in the U-shaped space. This meant there were plenty of people to distract a performer as they laughed at the well-timed, well-delivered jokes. But the performers were professional, and each of them lost within the scene, not appearing to ever notice the loud, or occasionally scattered, laughter.

The stage was deep, but it was not of a typical size or shape. Performers were sometimes standing less than a metre in front of the front row audience, providing an immersive experience for all involved. This U-shape was paired with a second-storey balcony stage, only a few metres deep and appearing as part of the stage structure if you didn’t know any better. The few rows of stairs and the walkways surrounding the seating area were included as part of the stage a few times. Personally, I wish they could’ve had more opportunities from the script to use the walkways and stairs; the creative use elevated and enhanced the experience.

 

 

Being U-shaped was also a downfall for the performers. It can be challenging enough for a performer on stage not to turn their back on the audience, but in this instance, it often couldn’t be helped. Parts of the audience missed out on the comical reactions, the subtle and not-so-subtle facial expressions, and even important prop sightings. It was infrequent, but some moments were stagnant, with performers seeming to forget half the audience was behind them (yes, this did happen on purpose a few times, and it was well blocked for those particular scenes), and I could see audience members straining to spot the speaker. The first interaction between the author, Laura, and our lead, Emma, was alive and energetic, covering the stage and including everyone around them. Understandably, there’s only so much you can do with a space such as this one, and this was the only downfall of the performance that this author noticed. I feel it is important to note that even if the performer’s back was turned, at no point did I struggle to hear or understand what was being said; every performer had a clear voice and pronunciation, even if their characters ran their words together.

In saying that, the cast acted and reacted with and to one another spectacularly. If there were a crowd in the background they brought the foreground scene to life with murmurings, rustles, and reactions to the main speaker. Carefully choreographed scenes were executed so in sync that it seemed natural. They brought not only spoken comedy, but also a varying amount of slapstick and physical comedy to keep the audience on their metaphorical toes.

Helping to keep the audience on their toes were the set changes. While each set was minimalist, stagehands weren’t the ones changing the sets; rather, the performers were. While this was done well, and background noise over the speakers guided the audience into a scene change, some scenes changed so rapidly that it took a moment to catch up. While this worked with the script, when you aren’t expecting it to happen in this style, it can be jarring to begin with. The lighting is perfect for the story, and has few large changes, aside from some spotlights and some coloured choices in the second act, but does little to guide the audience through a set change. As an audience member, we must remember that while Jane Austen would never allow a well-bred member of society to carry their own chair, the meta version of these characters certainly don’t mind.

The costumes were beautifully regency era, and aside from the Redcoats, each character was sporting different colours and accessories to stand out to the crowd. If you aren’t familiar with the characters these costumes were incredibly helpful in keeping up with who was who. There were minimal costume changes, but the big ones that weren’t pointed out by the performers felt like easter eggs for the audience … one or two of the dresses even had pockets! The costumes represented the social standing of each character with elegance, tassels, careful embroidery, and well-chosen shoes.

 

As for the characters … I am hesitant to say too much and risk ruining anything for the readers. Be prepared to laugh, gasp, sigh, and maybe get a little teary. See the Watson family, in real time, lose some, win some, become appalled, find love, and even lust. Observe the Osborne family derail themselves to become the more interesting, more fulfilling versions of themselves. See side characters take a stand to be more involved in the story, or demand they get to grow and learn their endings; watch a cad find his way in the world; find out that the Redcoats have names; and try to spot Nanny polishing silverware for almost an entire scene.

In summary, everything has been thought of to reflect the (multiple) existential crises happening before you. I found each performer to be captivating, without stealing the spotlight from other cast members – even with some of those spectacular sideburns. Act II has more modern vernacular and is slightly crude (there are content warnings in the programs you can purchase at the ticket booth), but is tastefully done, for the most part. This is meta, this is fourth wall breaking, this is not always polite society, but it is laughing at itself and having fun.

I will say, I feel that one content warning is missing: If you are a writer, be prepared to potentially feel personally victimised by some of Laura’s lines about why writers write.

All in all, the performance begs you to find the answer to the question, “Is that very Jane Austen?”

To book tickets to The Watsons, please visit https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1324505.

Photographer: Richard Parkhill

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Blood Wedding: Picking at a Scab Until it Bleeds

Blood Wedding

Blood Wedding Rating

Click if you liked this article

4

Bloody and haunting, Blood Wedding is a tale of star-crossed lovers, and the carnage that begets their ill-fated romance. This play is chilling, a glimpse into the isolation in the wake of war and how pain and jealousy can amalgamate into complete and total hatred.

Blood Wedding is an exceptionally well written story, riddled with characters each in a unique state of hurt, so much so that, despite the fore-shadowing of the play’s title, it’s still shocking and saddening to see the final confrontation play out. Director Deborah Leiser-Moore brings the script to life by highlighting this pain and isolation through an attention to motion and the physical division of the set. Key scenes take place without dialogue, with the character’s emotion expressed solely through the body. The play concludes with a bloody fight, played out as if in slow motion, each strike by the male leads aching as they fight for their final act of honour. Creative choices like this allowed the audience to hurt with these characters and crawl under their skin to feel their pain in these titular moments.

JMC presents some striking talent in this production, particularly Mia Connoli and Teresa Giansiracusa. I connected the most with these two characters and was blown away by how much each character wore their hearts on their sleeves. Mia Connoli as leonardo’s Wife has a beautiful voice, and her vocals added a beautiful haunt of mystery as the plot reveals itself. Teresa Giansiracusa as the Bride was heartbreaking as the lead, presenting a palpable inner conflict, especially during her monologue she performs in the bath, the morning of her wedding day. Dion Zapantis as Leonardo Felix was also fully committed, and brought an electric physicality to his performance.

 

 

My favourite part of the show was the soundscape. Aside from a few more upbeat songs breaking up the tragedy of the performance, the score was a series of evocative, echoing vocals that really dig into your chest. At the start of the wedding scene, these were incredibly powerful, especially watching as each actor flowed silently between the mixed emotions of the wedding. These vocals sprinkle through the show and despite the warm lighting, evoke a cold atmosphere and a fascinating juxtaposition.

I loved the staging choices; the elevation of Teresa Giansiracusa’s character at the beginning, high and unattainable, but feeling severed and alone. I loved how Mia Connoli’s character stayed predominately in the dark, shadowed beneath the platform suspending Giansiracusa and her baby, at the back in the deepest pocket of the stage, long forgotten by Leonardo Felix. Tess Lynch Steele as Mother manning the front corner of the stage with her brutal onion station, mourning the loss of her son and husband but expressing it only through a wish for further bloodshed. The set feels unfinished and raw, complimenting the story and working in favour of the show, allowing the performances and physicality to be what shines through.

Blood Wedding is a show that picks at a wound until it bleeds; a stubborn, yet brutal portrait of masculinity under the patriarchy and its collateral damage.

To book tickets to Blood Wedding, please visit https://www.theatreworks.org.au/2025/blood-wedding.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

An Unlikely Couple

Waterloo

Waterloo Rating

Click if you liked this article

3

‘Waterloo’ is modern day theatre from clever performance artist, Bron Batten, a multi award-winning Australian performer, theatre-maker and producer, in collaboration with non-artists and audience members. (Outside Eye Direction by Gary Abrahams.)

From the people who created ‘Onstage Dating’, ‘Waterloo’ turns their observations inward, exposing us to Bron Batten’s ill-fated affair and deconstructing the ideological distance between right and left.

This unique show explores what happens when a self-confessed “lefty, Greens voting, almost vegan theatre artist” dates a right-wing, cigar smoking Margaret Thatcher-loving Tory soldier. Batten met this “2nd protagonist” when she was on an arts residency in Paris in 2015 – and he turned out to be a conservative, highly decorated, high-ranking UK military official. Clearly, they had different political views yet found an intense connection and their time together formed the core narrative of Waterloo.

Batten tells us this story as one would tell a friend about her unlikely romance, a couple obviously drawn to each other in ways just as unknown as the violence we bury our heads in the sand about daily. With her warmth, creativity and truthfulness, often heavy themes of love, war and politics prove easier to digest than they first sound.

Developed in Maubourguet France, with Vitalstatistix Incubator Residency in Adelaide, a creative residency at Brunswick Mechanic’s Institute, Melbourne, with an Arts House Development Award and North Melbourne Stalker Residency, and then at Melbourne Fringe in 2019, while still morphing, this edgy piece has won awards in Melbourne and Perth and won the Summerhall Edinburgh Fringe Touring Award, in 2019.

 

 

You’ll find Waterloo strangely entertaining and thought provoking. You’ll be thinking on it for days afterward, even questioning your usual beliefs. As the daughter of a Lieutenant Colonel, my beliefs seemed lonely in a room full of students and Arts workers, but Batten wrote her questions to the audience so well, I’m sure they were also surprised at some of the final audience views.

Batten said in a recent interview she “Hoped the work would provoke reflection and discussion amongst the audience and perhaps a healthy debate in the car on the way home.” I believe her hopes have become reality.

That’s the beauty of Waterloo. Moments of divisiveness lead to moments of poignant clarity, followed by moments of humanity and the realisation we are all connected and desire human connection.

This production is not only enjoyable, it’s important, giving those of us on both sides of politics a safe space to debate our differences, respectfully.

Bron’s work has toured throughout Australia, New Zealand, the USA, France, the UK, Germany, the Czech Republic, Lithuania and Romania and has been presented at festivals and venues including The Soho Theatre London, Summerhall Edinburgh, Komedia Brighton UK, The Prague Quadrennial, Performing Arts Festival Berlin, RISING, Darwin Festival, Brisbane Festival, Dark MOFO and the Edinburgh Festival Fringe.

Founded in 1979, Theatre Works is an independent theatre group with a lot to say. Check it out. Waterloo plays at Theatre Works – 14 Acland Street, St Kilda – from 8th to 12th July, 2025.

To book tickets to Waterloo, please visit http://theatreworks.org.au/2025/waterloo.

Photographer: Lucy Parakhina

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

I Wanna See ‘I Wanna Be Mark Wahlberg’ Again

I Wanna Be Mark Wahlberg

I Wanna Be Mark Wahlberg Rating

Click if you liked this article

Melody Rachel is a magnetic performer, and ‘I Wanna Be Mark Wahlberg’ gives her an opportunity to flex her muscles both literally and figuratively. There’s space within this show for movement, words, hair-flips and perfectly timed smirks to explore masculinity with a light touch and perfectly placed pair of Calvin Klein briefs.

By her own admission, this show changes every time Melody performs it, and this particular iteration for Qtopia’s Pride Fest 2025 is striking and fun. Between feats of endurance and the interplay of body and shadow, there’s stark observations and crushing moments of vulnerability.

Some of the most moving moments come from the exploration of physical expressions of gender; femininity as performance particularly has real pain, especially in contrast to the moments of comedy drawn out in the pre-show and intro investigating how men move. There’s real subtlety in this show; small movements tell us a lot, and provide both their own arc and the bedrock for the retelling of people’s reactions and assumptions (both in queer spaces and outside of them).

 

The intimacy of the Substation theatre space helps the energy of this show to hit straight to the heart. There’s a vulnerability for both performer and audience to be in such close proximity, and this show does crackle with energy because of this. Qtopia has fitted their spaces with precision; it’s one of the most exciting spaces to see theatre in the inner Sydney buffet. The rest of Pride Fest this June offers a collection of opportunities to see new works here. The raw walls and high ceilings allow for Melody’s use of shadow and light to feel cinematic and huge, despite the intimacy of the place.

To march so directly into the breach of navigating maleness and masculinity, femaleness, femininity and everything in between is only possible in the hands of a performer willing to put their neck on the line, which Melody does. There’s real stakes here, real laughs, real tension and a whole lot of interesting questions.

Unfortunately, this show has closed after a limited number of performances at Pride Fest this year, but should the opportunity to step into Melody Rachel’s world arise in another context, this reviewer would recommend that you do so.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!