Jane “Meta” Austen

The Watsons

The Watsons Rating

Click if you liked this article

2

This is not your typical Jane Austen show. This is meta chaos.

Act I is what you would expect from anything attached to Jane Austen and the regency era; talks of marriage for both love and gain, a ball (complete with dance), proper introductions being made, and fast proposals. But what happens when the author inserts herself into the story and the characters rebel? Act II is a chaotic ride answering just that … and then some.

Please note I am calling the actors and actresses “performers” to avoid any unintentional mis-gendering.

The theatre boasts 120 seats, and at the time of the show starting, I could only spot four empty seats in the U-shaped space. This meant there were plenty of people to distract a performer as they laughed at the well-timed, well-delivered jokes. But the performers were professional, and each of them lost within the scene, not appearing to ever notice the loud, or occasionally scattered, laughter.

The stage was deep, but it was not of a typical size or shape. Performers were sometimes standing less than a metre in front of the front row audience, providing an immersive experience for all involved. This U-shape was paired with a second-storey balcony stage, only a few metres deep and appearing as part of the stage structure if you didn’t know any better. The few rows of stairs and the walkways surrounding the seating area were included as part of the stage a few times. Personally, I wish they could’ve had more opportunities from the script to use the walkways and stairs; the creative use elevated and enhanced the experience.

 

 

Being U-shaped was also a downfall for the performers. It can be challenging enough for a performer on stage not to turn their back on the audience, but in this instance, it often couldn’t be helped. Parts of the audience missed out on the comical reactions, the subtle and not-so-subtle facial expressions, and even important prop sightings. It was infrequent, but some moments were stagnant, with performers seeming to forget half the audience was behind them (yes, this did happen on purpose a few times, and it was well blocked for those particular scenes), and I could see audience members straining to spot the speaker. The first interaction between the author, Laura, and our lead, Emma, was alive and energetic, covering the stage and including everyone around them. Understandably, there’s only so much you can do with a space such as this one, and this was the only downfall of the performance that this author noticed. I feel it is important to note that even if the performer’s back was turned, at no point did I struggle to hear or understand what was being said; every performer had a clear voice and pronunciation, even if their characters ran their words together.

In saying that, the cast acted and reacted with and to one another spectacularly. If there were a crowd in the background they brought the foreground scene to life with murmurings, rustles, and reactions to the main speaker. Carefully choreographed scenes were executed so in sync that it seemed natural. They brought not only spoken comedy, but also a varying amount of slapstick and physical comedy to keep the audience on their metaphorical toes.

Helping to keep the audience on their toes were the set changes. While each set was minimalist, stagehands weren’t the ones changing the sets; rather, the performers were. While this was done well, and background noise over the speakers guided the audience into a scene change, some scenes changed so rapidly that it took a moment to catch up. While this worked with the script, when you aren’t expecting it to happen in this style, it can be jarring to begin with. The lighting is perfect for the story, and has few large changes, aside from some spotlights and some coloured choices in the second act, but does little to guide the audience through a set change. As an audience member, we must remember that while Jane Austen would never allow a well-bred member of society to carry their own chair, the meta version of these characters certainly don’t mind.

The costumes were beautifully regency era, and aside from the Redcoats, each character was sporting different colours and accessories to stand out to the crowd. If you aren’t familiar with the characters these costumes were incredibly helpful in keeping up with who was who. There were minimal costume changes, but the big ones that weren’t pointed out by the performers felt like easter eggs for the audience … one or two of the dresses even had pockets! The costumes represented the social standing of each character with elegance, tassels, careful embroidery, and well-chosen shoes.

 

As for the characters … I am hesitant to say too much and risk ruining anything for the readers. Be prepared to laugh, gasp, sigh, and maybe get a little teary. See the Watson family, in real time, lose some, win some, become appalled, find love, and even lust. Observe the Osborne family derail themselves to become the more interesting, more fulfilling versions of themselves. See side characters take a stand to be more involved in the story, or demand they get to grow and learn their endings; watch a cad find his way in the world; find out that the Redcoats have names; and try to spot Nanny polishing silverware for almost an entire scene.

In summary, everything has been thought of to reflect the (multiple) existential crises happening before you. I found each performer to be captivating, without stealing the spotlight from other cast members – even with some of those spectacular sideburns. Act II has more modern vernacular and is slightly crude (there are content warnings in the programs you can purchase at the ticket booth), but is tastefully done, for the most part. This is meta, this is fourth wall breaking, this is not always polite society, but it is laughing at itself and having fun.

I will say, I feel that one content warning is missing: If you are a writer, be prepared to potentially feel personally victimised by some of Laura’s lines about why writers write.

All in all, the performance begs you to find the answer to the question, “Is that very Jane Austen?”

To book tickets to The Watsons, please visit https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1324505.

Photographer: Richard Parkhill

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

The Penelopiad: The Untold Odyssey

The Penelopiad

The Penelopiad Rating

Click if you liked this article

2

The Penelopiad is a novella written by Margaret Atwood as a mythological reimagining of the classic Greek tale of Homer’s Odyssey. But, unlike Odyssey, The Penelopiad follows a linear structure, making the tale somewhat easier to follow. Atwood’s storytelling gives Odysseus’ wife, Penelope, a voice and allows the account to be told from her perspective. As such, Atwood has been accused of writing a feminist story, which she denies, but given her well-publicised views on feminism, this is an interesting consideration. What this storytelling does is highlight the difference a perspective can make.

From the Underworld, Penelope begins by telling of her childhood, at which time her father tried to drown her, but she survived, saved by a flock of ducks. Her twelve maids, who were later hanged by Penelope’s son, Telemachus and Odysseus, often interrupt her storytelling to voice their experiences, which contrast with Penelope’s privilege, as they recount their suffering. Penelope’s marriage to Odysseus is built on a lie as he cheats in a running race to win her hand, but ultimately she does fall in love with him and is not aware of the deception.

Odysseus spends 10 years in Troy defending the honour of King Menelaus and over this time Penelope is tasked with finding another suitor as Odysseus is not returning home. Following Penelope’s orders, The Maid’s plight ends horribly. When Odysseus eventually returns home, he engages his childhood nurse Eurycleia to tell him which of Penelope’s maids have been disloyal to him and he and his son Telemachus hang the disloyal twelve.

Penelope’s maids avoid her in the Underworld, and she still blames Helen (King Menelaus’ wife) for the Trojan War. She also continues to meet Odysseus whenever one of his new lives ends, as he consistently chooses to be reborn into the world of the living. However, the maids are tireless in their pursuit of Odysseus, haunting him on earth and in the Underworld.

The University of Adelaide Theatre Guild has taken on the mammoth task of bringing this story to life and, overall, the cast worked cohesively and were clearly committed to making the production a success. The Twelve Maids choral work was a welcome interlude as they executed Kristin Stefanoff’s original music beautifully, especially when considering their primary job was as dramatic performers. Costuming was effective and better utilised in the second half when the maids’ roles as both male and female characters were distinguished by the wearing of masks.

The moving of a seating prop was somewhat noisy and distracting – hopefully, this will not be the case in upcoming performances. The fight scene was well-choreographed but lacked intensity, although this may develop throughout the run of the production. Direction was imaginative in its use of the intimate space that the University’s Little Theatre provides.

Jane Ford portrayed Penelope with a convincing level of believability (a massive role full of lengthy monologues that this actor performed without one stumble – bravo), Theo Papazis did a credible job of his portrayal of Odysseus, but his Australian accent broke the characterisation on occasion. The Twelve Maids were committed to their roles; however, the wearing of modern nail polish, face piercings and modern jewellery felt out of place in this production. Kudos for a standout performance for this reviewer was Fredrick Pincombe as Telemachus – this is an actor to be watched!

The Penelopiad runs from 23 May to 1 June 2025; remaining session dates and times are as follows:-
– Wednesday 28 May at 6:30pm (with post-show Q&A)
– Thursday 29 May at 7:30pm
– Friday 30 May at 7:30pm
– Saturday 31 May at 3pm
– Sunday 1 June at 3pm

To book tickets to The Penelopiad, please visit https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1324503.

Photography: Maggie Morris of The Multimedia Emporium

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Little Theatre Presents: The 39 Steps

The 39 Steps

The 39 Steps Rating

Click if you liked this article

2

Director Mark Wickett with the University of Adelaide Theatre Guild definitely had the audience roaring with laughter. Written as a spy thriller by John Buchanan and later adapted for film by Hitchcock, this production of the 39 Steps contains all the mystery of the original story with a good measure of parody!

The fabulous cast of four included Emily Branford and Maxwell Whigham, who flawlessly played multiple roles, often in the same scenes. This rapid change of character, accent, and costume was done with great skill and tenacity! The whole production was infused with energy and laughter.

Thomas Midena’s solid portrayal of Hannay, on the run from suspicion following a murder in London, represented a steadier character, taking the audience with him on his journey to unravel the mystery and clear his name. Imogen Deller-Evans as Pamela, Annabella, and Margaret weaved in and out of Hannay’s path as potential love interests in different locations and accents with comedic effects. The pair had brilliant onstage chemistry.

 

The Little Theatre served as an intimate location, and the dual levels of the stage and balcony were utilised to perfection. Not to mention, Foley artist Angela Short drew the audience’s attention in multiple areas. The timing and attention to detail as Hannay turned on the light switch and opened the blind were impressive.

My favourite sound was the train carriage movement! The play was interactive, which drew the audience in. The design and costume were clever, with the ingenious portrayal of a plane, dogs, and countryside sheep having the audience roar with laughter.

Congratulations to all involved at The University of Adelaide Theatre Guild for brilliantly executing a fete of skill, stamina and comedic timing in this production of The 39 Steps.

The 39 Steps is only running for 1 more week. For tickets, please book @ https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1156175

Remaining Performance Dates
Wednesday 30 October at 6:30pm – *with post-show Q&A*
Thursday 31 October at 7:30pm
Friday 1 November at 7:30pm
Saturday 2 November at 7:30pm
Sunday 3 November at 4pm

Duration:- Approximately 2 hours + interval

Venue:- Little Theatre, The Cloisters, Victoria Drive, University of Adelaide

Photographer: Nat Kelly

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

King Lear: Presented by The Theatre Guild

King Lear

King Lear Rating

Click if you liked this article

1

The University of Adelaide Theatre Guild have placed their production of King Lear in a post-apocalyptic dystopian setting which is set amidst the madness of a world in ruins more than reminiscent of the Mad Max series. I would not have been surprised if Dementus (Chris Hemsworth) walked in to play the old deranged king, there are a number of parallels.

Director Brant Eustice says, “There is enormous joy to be found in Shakespeare’s universal themes and a brilliance in his writing which not only allows, but also encourages theatregoers to continue exploring the depth, complexity and beauty of his stories in new styles. Due to a global calamity, civilisation as we view it has collapsed and has returned to the ways of a distant past. We find ourselves in a world which is slowly trying to rebuild itself.”

This production succeeds in most ways, but does not always achieve Eustice’s aims.

For those who don’t know the play, King Lear is based on the legend of Leir of Britain. Lear decides to divide his kingdom among his three daughters, but he is deceived by the flattery of Goneril and Regan, who turn against him, and he banishes the loyal Cordelia, who loves him. Lear becomes mad and wanders in a storm, while Cordelia returns with an army to restore him. The play ends with the deaths of Lear and his daughters.

According to the esteemed critic Frank Kermode, “the play…offers neither its good characters nor its audience any relief from its cruelty”. I disagree with Kermode in that while cruelty is more than evident, there is an abundance of humour in the play which Eustice highlights.

Every centimetre of the Little Theatre is used to advantage and thanks to Eustice’s direction, the scene changes are quick and efficient, and the characters are well developed.

His direction is complemented by Kate Prescott’s set design, Lisa Lanzi’s costume design, Richard Parkhill’s moody lighting, Sean Smith’s sound design. Michael Green’s original haunting music and Anne-Louise Smith’s hair teasing and primping.

This production features 16 performers, some playing multiple roles.

Michael Eustice joins an illustrious list of actors to play Lear; Orson Welles, Christopher Plummer, Ian McKellen, Derek Jacobi, and Glenda Jackson to name a few. Eustice’s Lear is bombastic, demanding and convincing in his decent into madness. His scene with the dead body of Cordelia is memorable.

Sharon Malujlo’s Kent holds the narrative together, especially when in disguise and provides comic relief to the more sombre sections of the play.

Robert Baulderstone’s Edgar is compelling to watch. His physicality is wonderful and his voice crystal clear. His ‘naked’ scene is a highlight of the play!

Sean Flierl’s Edmund is appropriately villain-like as he plots against his father and brother. His swordplay with Edgar is frighteningly realistic.

Geoff Revell as Fool steals every scene with carefully delivered wisdom and the occasional breaking of the fourth wall to include the audience. I loved his scene with Lear on the mezzanine level of the theatre.

As the three daughters, Georgia Stockham as Goneril, Rebecca Kemp as Regan and Rhoda Sylvester as Cordelia all deliver solid work, but there were some problems with diction and projection at times that resulted in some of the dialogue being lost when their backs were turned or voices raised.

Tracey Walker is a commanding Albany with one of the clearest Shakespearean deliveries I have heard.

Director Brant Eustice replaced Mick Young (who had to withdraw due to illness) as Gloucester gives us a moving performance, particularly in act 2 when his eyes are gouged out.

Imogen Deller-Evans, Mike Leach, Harry Passehl, Tony Sampson, Tom Tassone, and Lizzie Zeuner complete the cast playing multiple roles.

Being a long play (even with cuts), it might have been advisable to start this production at 7pm.

King Lear is one of the Bard’s greatest works and the University of Adelaide Theatre Guild’s production is well thought out and delivers some fine performances. I think the Bard would approve of the new setting!

Barry Hill OAM

For Tickets:-
https://www.adelaide.edu.au/theatreguild/

Ticket Information
$25 Full Price
$20 Concession / Tertiary Student

Performance Dates
Friday 16 August at 7:30pm
Saturday 17 August at 7:30pm
Sunday 18 August at 4pm
Wednesday 21 August at 7:30pm
Thursday 22 August at 7:30pm
Friday 23 August at 7:30pm
Saturday 24 August at 7:30pm
Sunday 25 August at 4pm

Venue
Little Theatre
The Cloisters, Victoria Drive, University of Adelaide
Please allow extra time for parking, especially when there is an event at Adelaide Oval.

Duration
2.5 hours plus interval

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Spread the word on your favourite platform!