The Penelopiad: The Untold Odyssey

The Penelopiad

The Penelopiad Rating

Click if you liked this article

2

The Penelopiad is a novella written by Margaret Atwood as a mythological reimagining of the classic Greek tale of Homer’s Odyssey. But, unlike Odyssey, The Penelopiad follows a linear structure, making the tale somewhat easier to follow. Atwood’s storytelling gives Odysseus’ wife, Penelope, a voice and allows the account to be told from her perspective. As such, Atwood has been accused of writing a feminist story, which she denies, but given her well-publicised views on feminism, this is an interesting consideration. What this storytelling does is highlight the difference a perspective can make.

From the Underworld, Penelope begins by telling of her childhood, at which time her father tried to drown her, but she survived, saved by a flock of ducks. Her twelve maids, who were later hanged by Penelope’s son, Telemachus and Odysseus, often interrupt her storytelling to voice their experiences, which contrast with Penelope’s privilege, as they recount their suffering. Penelope’s marriage to Odysseus is built on a lie as he cheats in a running race to win her hand, but ultimately she does fall in love with him and is not aware of the deception.

Odysseus spends 10 years in Troy defending the honour of King Menelaus and over this time Penelope is tasked with finding another suitor as Odysseus is not returning home. Following Penelope’s orders, The Maid’s plight ends horribly. When Odysseus eventually returns home, he engages his childhood nurse Eurycleia to tell him which of Penelope’s maids have been disloyal to him and he and his son Telemachus hang the disloyal twelve.

Penelope’s maids avoid her in the Underworld, and she still blames Helen (King Menelaus’ wife) for the Trojan War. She also continues to meet Odysseus whenever one of his new lives ends, as he consistently chooses to be reborn into the world of the living. However, the maids are tireless in their pursuit of Odysseus, haunting him on earth and in the Underworld.

The University of Adelaide Theatre Guild has taken on the mammoth task of bringing this story to life and, overall, the cast worked cohesively and were clearly committed to making the production a success. The Twelve Maids choral work was a welcome interlude as they executed Kristin Stefanoff’s original music beautifully, especially when considering their primary job was as dramatic performers. Costuming was effective and better utilised in the second half when the maids’ roles as both male and female characters were distinguished by the wearing of masks.

The moving of a seating prop was somewhat noisy and distracting – hopefully, this will not be the case in upcoming performances. The fight scene was well-choreographed but lacked intensity, although this may develop throughout the run of the production. Direction was imaginative in its use of the intimate space that the University’s Little Theatre provides.

Jane Ford portrayed Penelope with a convincing level of believability (a massive role full of lengthy monologues that this actor performed without one stumble – bravo), Theo Papazis did a credible job of his portrayal of Odysseus, but his Australian accent broke the characterisation on occasion. The Twelve Maids were committed to their roles; however, the wearing of modern nail polish, face piercings and modern jewellery felt out of place in this production. Kudos for a standout performance for this reviewer was Fredrick Pincombe as Telemachus – this is an actor to be watched!

The Penelopiad runs from 23 May to 1 June 2025; remaining session dates and times are as follows:-
– Wednesday 28 May at 6:30pm (with post-show Q&A)
– Thursday 29 May at 7:30pm
– Friday 30 May at 7:30pm
– Saturday 31 May at 3pm
– Sunday 1 June at 3pm

To book tickets to The Penelopiad, please visit https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1324503.

Photography: Maggie Morris of The Multimedia Emporium

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

German Film Festival: Mother’s Baby

Mother's Baby

Mother’s Baby Rating

Click if you liked this article

Mothers are supposed to feel an instant, unbreakable bond with their newborn child; or at least, that’s what we’re led to believe. Austrian director, Johanna Moder’s new film, Mother’s Baby, bleakly reminds us that this isn’t always the case.

Forty year old music conductor Julia (Marie Leuenberger) and her loving husband, Georg (Hans Löw), desperately want a baby. When nature doesn’t deliver, they seek the help of Dr Vilfort (Claes Bang), a renowned fertility specialist. In Vilfort’s pristine private clinic, Moder introduces early on an axolotl, a strange looking amphibian that catches Julia’s interest but comes to haunt her (and viewers) later in the film.

With Dr Vilfort’s treatment proving successful, Julia and Georg wait expectantly for the birth of their longed for child. Yet the birth is a difficult one. The baby is whisked away by a medical team as soon as it is born. Moder captures Julia and Georg’s muted shock as they are kept in limbo waiting to meet their baby. When Julia finally gets to hold her baby, she seems underwhelmed, even detached from the child. Julia’s struggle to breastfeed only heightens her disappointment. An overly zealous midwife played by Julia Franz Richter doesn’t help as she pushes Julia to bottle feed instead.

Once home, Julia, long used to being in control in her professional life, continues to struggle to bond with her baby. Usually surrounded by music, the weirdly silent baby she has birthed, starts to unnerve her. Is there something wrong with the child or is Julia paranoid? Hans’ instant bond with their son, who Julia persists in referring to as ‘it’, adds to Julia’s distress.

In one particularly tense moment, Hans returns home from work to be greeted by the sight of Julia engrossed in her music, oblivious to her unfed baby. Julia’s sudden identity shift from world class conductor to stay at home mother has hit her hard. Hans fails to understand, reminding Julia as they argue that ‘It’s what we agreed!’. Is Julia’s lack of maternal connection with her baby a tell-tale sign of postpartum depression or is there something more sinister at play?

Increasingly frustrated by Julia’s unexpected reaction to new motherhood even the normally placid Georg starts to doubt his wife’s mental stability. Returning to Dr Vilfort, Julia insists there is something wrong with her baby, demanding answers from the preternaturally cool physician. In what smacks of medical misogyny, Vilfort condescendingly suggests Julia is the problem. We cringe as Georg joins cravenly with the doctor in agreeing that Julia needs help.

Moder’s psychologically chilling story of new motherhood achieves its aim of unnerving its viewers so that they feel vicariously the altered reality of the postpartum phase. Billed as a dark comedy, the film is inconsistent in creating humour; nonetheless, Moder is successful in capturing the absurdity of motherhood in a world which continues to unfairly insist on idealising maternity.

To book tickets to Mother’s Baby, or any other film in the German Film Festival, please visit https://germanfilmfestival.com.au/.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Murder at Checkmate Manor

Murder at Checkmate Manor

Murder at Checkmate Manor Rating

Click if you liked this article

A company well known for their pantomimes, comedies, and British farces; Tea Tree Players Theatre Company offer something within the same vein but perhaps at an all-new extreme. Julie Datson’s production of ‘The Farndale Avenue Housing Estate Townswomen’s Guild Dramatic Society Murder Mystery – Murder at Checkmate Manor’ will take audiences back to the era of cheesy country town hall entertainment, complete with dated fashion parades, cute quizzes during interval, and constantly breaking the fourth wall.

At the doors of the theatre, the audience is greeted and invited in by Thelma (Hayley Mitchell) who tells us she has recently been crowned ‘Miss Farndale 2025’, loudly and excitedly ushering people in. The unorthodox and absurd tone of the show is further consolidated as people are seated with elements of the small, deliberately flimsy set falling apart and the crew coming onstage to attempt to ‘fix’ them. With set walls appearing to be rushed in quality, the stair rail frequently wobbling out of place, the chess set often collapsing, chairs malfunctioning, and curtains constantly drooping, complete chaos is expected to follow.

The cast matches this level of calamity with their characters’ deliberately bad acting, including the monotonous recitation of lines, poorly timed or incorrect entrances, skipping pages of dialogue, forgotten or incomplete costume changes, uncontrollable giggling, and the correcting and prompting of each other on stage. As the show progresses, moments range from entertaining to excruciating as the plot is lost amongst the theatrical carnage, and while the identity of the murderer may be obvious, the ending is not.

With the challenge to act badly well, the actors certainly rose to the occasion and were clearly able to have a lot of fun with it. Chris Galipo channels the benevolent Mrs Reece, overwhelmed by having taken on too many characters whilst hosting and managing the community event as well. Mitchell’s Thelma is earnestly demanding in her attempts to be the centre of attention, enthusiastically delivering many of her lines to the audience rather than her co-stars. Jo-Anne Davis’s awkward performance as Felicity is comical, as she tries to navigate which side of stage to come through and juggle the incredibly quick costume changes between Butler Pawn and Colonel King.

Meredith Kreig is hysterical as Audrey, whose various characters involve a deadpan voice or giggles at inappropriate moments. Finally, Ashleigh Merriel as Sylvia, who plays Inspector O’Reilly, is fantastically matter of fact and tired of everyone else mucking around. Together, this cast lean into everything that goes wrong and encourage each other to reach the extreme of their scene.

While the set was compact, the space was used well between the five performers as it wasn’t often that they were all on at the same time. While the large white armchair, stair railing, and chessboard were central pieces, there were photographs and various ornaments scattered around were small details that added nicely to the community feel. Lighting and sound were used to keep the gags going, particularly when black outs came too early or late, the wrong sound effect was used, or just to emphasise comic timing. However, it can also be said that there comes a point where less is more, and some niche references to home video narration will go over the heads of those under the usual demographic of about 65.

Sprinkled through with the occasional innuendo and plenty of shenanigans, this production was filled with many moments where they’re so bad they’re good.

To book tickets to Murder at Checkmate Manor, please visit https://teatreeplayers.com/production/the-farndale-avenue-housing-estate-townswomens-guild-dramatic-society-murder-mystery/.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

How Much Honesty Is The Best Policy?

What Marielle Knows

What Marielle Knows Rating

Click if you liked this article

What Marielle Knows is a part of Melbourne’s German Film Festival for 2025. It was selected and screened at the Berlinale this year and follows parents Julia and Tobias when they discover that their daughter can see and hear everything they do, whether she is with them or not. The film is advertised as a comedy, however I think it would be better suited to a dark comedy label, dabbling very closely with drama. The film centres on the married couple and how through discovering their daughter’s sudden telepathic abilities, the fragile foundations of their relationship start to crumble and teeter them dangerously close to divorce.

The film tackles a lot in its 86 minute run time, which makes for a really engaging watch. On the surface What Marielle Knows is looking at lying, where the line is, what does honesty mean when compared to truth, and how much of the truth we should share with the people in our lives. Underneath that, it interrogates family dynamics, how each parent has a distinctly different connection with the same child and how this can be manipulated by either parent. It looks at the plain and simple morality of a child and tries to apply those black and white notions to complicated, more mature feelings.

At the bottom of the iceberg, the film is an exploration of the lessons parents teach their kids, commenting on how although they don’t see every action their parents take, there will always be a follow through of emotional consequences. I enjoyed the way the film brought each of these themes up. It felt as though director Frédéric Hambalek thought carefully about each when embedding them into the film’s narrative.

What did divert this understanding for me, was little attention the film paid to Marielle herself. Her parents are the main characters and in many ways Marielle serves as the antagonist, so it was an interesting creative choice to only really examine her reactions through the slow motion, rainbow dyed frames of her that were inserted between moments like title cards. It didn’t do a disservice to the story, as it focused on parental guilt and the pressures of trying to be a good parent and what that even means, but it did make me itch for a version of events told from her eyes, how she’s reacting to some of the more intense moments Julia and Tobias experience.

The greatest highlight of the film to me was the performances. Julia Jentsch, who played Julia, Felix Kramer who portrayed Tobias and Laeni Geiseler who was Marielle, all really brought their characters to life in a way that really allowed me to empathise with all of them. Felix Kramer in particular really shone to me, he conveyed a man on the brink of a nervous breakdown with such careful restraint; the whole film I was waiting to watch the delicate wire he perched his character on snap. Together, the cast had fantastic chemistry, despite their differing physical appearances, they really felt like a believable family unit.

As equally empathetic each character felt to the audience, I thought it was an interesting choice to make Julia’s character into the villain towards the end of the film. The film and Marielle gave Tobias much more grace for his actions, but gave Julia the most work to overcome. I didn’t necessarily resonate with this aspect of the story, considering how much Tobias consistently abused her trust throughout the film, however I do think that beneath this is an interesting discussion of where the line is when it comes to telling the ‘truth’.

For a comedy, this film packs its themes in air tight and gives the viewer plenty to chew on through a unique and original concept.

To book tickets to What Marielle Knows, or any other films in the German Film Festival, please visit https://germanfilmfestival.com.au/.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!