Little Theatre Presents: The 39 Steps

The 39 Steps

The 39 Steps Rating

Click if you liked this article

1

Director Mark Wickett with the University of Adelaide Theatre Guild definitely had the audience roaring with laughter. Written as a spy thriller by John Buchanan and later adapted for film by Hitchcock, this production of the 39 Steps contains all the mystery of the original story with a good measure of parody!

The fabulous cast of four included Emily Branford and Maxwell Whigham, who flawlessly played multiple roles, often in the same scenes. This rapid change of character, accent, and costume was done with great skill and tenacity! The whole production was infused with energy and laughter.

Thomas Midena’s solid portrayal of Hannay, on the run from suspicion following a murder in London, represented a steadier character, taking the audience with him on his journey to unravel the mystery and clear his name. Imogen Deller-Evans as Pamela, Annabella, and Margaret weaved in and out of Hannay’s path as potential love interests in different locations and accents with comedic effects. The pair had brilliant onstage chemistry.

 

The Little Theatre served as an intimate location, and the dual levels of the stage and balcony were utilised to perfection. Not to mention, Foley artist Angela Short drew the audience’s attention in multiple areas. The timing and attention to detail as Hannay turned on the light switch and opened the blind were impressive.

My favourite sound was the train carriage movement! The play was interactive, which drew the audience in. The design and costume were clever, with the ingenious portrayal of a plane, dogs, and countryside sheep having the audience roar with laughter.

Congratulations to all involved at The University of Adelaide Theatre Guild for brilliantly executing a fete of skill, stamina and comedic timing in this production of The 39 Steps.

The 39 Steps is only running for 1 more week. For tickets, please book @ https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1156175

Remaining Performance Dates
Wednesday 30 October at 6:30pm – *with post-show Q&A*
Thursday 31 October at 7:30pm
Friday 1 November at 7:30pm
Saturday 2 November at 7:30pm
Sunday 3 November at 4pm

Duration:- Approximately 2 hours + interval

Venue:- Little Theatre, The Cloisters, Victoria Drive, University of Adelaide

Photographer: Nat Kelly

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Hangmen

Hangmen

Hangmen Rating

Click if you liked this article

The turned-wood bar set is visible to the audience before the show begins. Ashtrays, partially drunk pints of beer, and a vase of silk flowers accompany a selection of era-appropriate music to initiate the immersive experience of the 1960s.

Opening with the heart-wrenching hanging of Hennessy (Trevor Anderson), it establishes the underlying discourse that questions the effectiveness of capital punishment when the line between innocent and guilty is unclear. Fast-forwarding to the abolition of this practice two years later, we meet the now-retired hangman Harry Wade who was responsible for said hanging.

Played superbly by Brant Eustace, Harry is a driving force of the play and a formidable presence to his regular customers, friends, and family. In an ambitious production that required the use of Northern English accents, Eustace commands the space with confidence and consistency, with the audience hanging on every boisterous word.

 

Helping to run the pub is his flinty wife Alice (Rachel Dalton) and naïve teenage daughter Shirley (Finty McBain), who add dimension and colour to the ensemble of regulars who frequent it. Among them are Bill, former Hangman Doctor and very convincing sot portrayed by Steve Marvanek, and comfortably indolent Inspector Fry by Russell Slater. Greg Janzow and Leighton Vogt provide some well-timed comic relief with the hearing-impaired Arthur and earnest Charlie, respectively, who often relays jokes for the former, only for Arthur to cut through to some uncomfortable truths.

This dark comedy is intensified by the fanatical tendencies of Joshua Coldwell’s performance as Peter Mooney. Contrasting unapologetically with a loud lower-class London accent, Mooney wafts comfortably into the pub and Shirley’s life, with chilling comments and claims that are Trump-like with their grandiosity. Leaving the audience unsure whether he is telling the truth, Coldwell creates a thrilling sense of unease and unpredictability as he interacts with the timid Syd Armfield, portrayed by Jack Robbins, playing with the themes of morality and justice. This is complemented with lighter humour in the form of Tom Tassone’s persistent reporter, Derek Clegg, and Gary George’s stage-stealing performance as Albert Pierrepoint, who makes Eustace’s Harry Wade look small.

Lighting was used to great effect to highlight specific areas of the stage to reduce set changes and to distinguish the times of day, with the inclusion of evocative 60’s songs to fill the blackout scene transitions. However, the overhanging section of the bar tended to create shadows over the faces of those leaning through from behind or blocking audience viewpoints with the pillars. Attention to detail in other elements, such as set pieces, costumes, and props, was a joy as they alluded to a specific time that appeared to be much loved.

 

Accents were understandably a challenge in this production, particularly as this reviewer has family in Yorkshire against which to compare. While Eustace and McBain reliably kept to their chosen region of Northern England, Dalton and Slater contained occasional tinges of Geordie, Irish, Yorkshire, and elements of Lancashire, but this didn’t detract from their character’s physicality.

The blend of comedy and tragedy in Martin McDonagh’s play ‘Hangmen’ is forefront in Fagan’s direction. This fast-paced evening of not knowing what to expect next bookends the controversial dialogue on capital punishment. This South Australian premiere, in an intimate theatre space, is not to be missed.

Book your tickets for Hangmen @ https://holdenstreettheatres.online.red61.com.au/event/890:17/

Season:- 26 October 2024-2 November 2024

Running Time:- 120 minutes

Venue:- Holden Street Theatres, The Studio

Photographer:- Richard Parkhill

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

The Crying Room: Exhumed

The Crying Room: Exhumed

The Crying Room: Exhumed Rating

Click if you liked this article

6

As we walk into a space with furniture covered with material, it feels like visiting an old mansion where memories are preserved from the passage of time under dust cloths. We become, inadvertently, part of the story. Exhuming the dead.

With the brilliant use of staging, technology and a mesmerizing live score, performer Marcus McKenzie takes us on a journey where death is treated more like a joke, with humorous anecdotes of various ways to die and fun interaction with the audience, where McKenzie finds the commonality between us and him, the fact that we all will eventually die. As we laugh and come up with future scenarios, our naivety is interrupted by phone calls from McKenzie’s brother, who we find out has passed away a while ago.

These real-time phone calls make us question the linearity of time. What is the present, and what is in the past? Through this technique, we are suddenly face to face with laptop screens, where McKenzie retells the story of when he found out about his brother’s passing. Prolonging the inevitable, he was fighting a battle between wanting to keep normality and finding the right time to face the inevitable.

 

Through this clever use of technology and screens, it suddenly feels like the play is no longer in a theatre but a one-on-one conversation, almost like stumbling upon a video diary, where you become privy to a very personal story of loss and broken dreams. 

By the end of the play, all that is left is a shrine to both McKenzie’s and possibly your personal trauma, the memories you thought you buried long ago but that have been exhumed. As you leave the theatre, the smiles and laughter that you shared only a moment ago are replaced by longing for the past, the illusive memory of your own life before you felt that sadness and hurt that you now share with McKenzie.

It is a captivating performance that will keep you thinking long after you leave the auditorium. On for four more nights only, don’t miss out on this incredible production.

This production is part of the Liveworks Festival 2024, which will be hosted at The Carriageworks Performance Space from 23rd to 27th October.

Follow the link to book in for this or any other shows during the festival @ https://carriageworks.com.au/events/liveworks-festival-2024/

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

The FUTURE is disappointing

FUTURE

FUTURE Rating

Click if you liked this article

2

The theatre collective PIGEONPIGEON showcased their play ‘FUTURE’ in the Melbourne Fringe Festival 2024. The original concept of taking different predictions about the future and turning them into a theatre production sparked my curiosity, and the hopeful tone of the synopsis intrigued me further.

I was disappointed by the incongruence of the synopsis and the show that I saw. It was very bleak. That’s not to say the show wasn’t without its strengths. I must give props to their use of props- giant jenga blocks and a large tome both full of predictions- were a couple of these that supported the show well. Some props were a little off-putting, such as a large notepad used to give prompts to their on stage “audience member”.

They built pace effectively to demonstrate a crescendo when reading through scripted predictions contained in a box, with the bits of paper left scattered around them. Following this an emotional monologue was delivered, where the very real, confronting, question many of us struggle to reconcile was raised- Is it fair on a child’s welfare to be brought into this world, when the climate crisis threatens their safety and wellbeing in ways we cannot yet even fathom. Unfortunately, the poorly synced text that was projected on the large screen behind them significantly detracted from the actor’s performance, and continued to irritate me throughout the entire show.

‘FUTURE’ felt structurally confused. I’d expected they would be dramatising different predictions on the future, instead it felt very bitsy with large chunks of the show entirely relying on audience participation. At the start of the show, they warned the audience about any loud sounds or bright lights to expect, painstakingly demonstrating the level of intensity that could be expected with each. This information was already provided in the ‘event warnings’ of the show summary. I’m sensitive to sound myself, but when I go to a play I expect my senses to be engaged and surprised throughout.

 

What I think was intended as a sensitive warning came across as pedantic coddling, delivered without any snappy energy to relieve the tension. It felt ironic, but I don’t think that was the intention. It provided an interesting subtext on the pervasive fog of anxiety Gen Z have grown up in, and the pendulum swing between action and inertia that often manifests. It would seem the entire framing and response is technology based, the cell phone is the gatekeeper, gateway, and fence. I wonder the level of awareness PIGEONPIGEON had on this, or if it was intrinsic.

A sore point for me was the en masse bagging of Taylor Swift from the cast and audience for her use of a private plane- is there really a practical alternative? As if she is the only carbon emitter on the planet, would she be so demonised if she wasn’t a powerful woman. Yet many far-left identifying people seem to have no issue fueling this hateful rhetoric. They might be surprised to know that her donations to various local UK foodbanks covered a years worth of meals for those organisations. I linger on this detail for two reasons- 1. It really frustrated me, and 2. It is emblematic of the show- a lot of negative commentary with little consideration for solutions.

I thought the “audience member” who came on stage had a certain charisma and levity that injected a bit of life into the show. Unfortunately, this impression waned as a function of the poor writing. The hope that was promised was hard to find. I think it was all strained into a bit about crabs that felt like it may have been inspired by The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy type absurdism, but rather missed the mark. Maybe if I was born 7 years later the show would have resonated with me more.

I did attend ‘FUTURE’ with another person who is of that generation who found the show stilted as I did; so, it’s not entirely a function of age as to whether the humour that was given was perceived as having landed or not. If you’re looking for some hope, I’d avoid ‘FUTURE’, unless you really like crabs and awkward jokes.

For further information about PIGEONPIGEON, please checkout: https://www.pigeonpigeon.co/

Photographer: Jaimi Houston

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!