The Birds: Gothic Horror At Belvoir

The Birds

The Birds Rating

Click if you liked this article

Feathers fly and beaks pierce in this contemporary take on Daphne du Maurier’s horror classic.

Gothic horror is officially having a revival. Nosferatu by Robert Eggers. Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein. Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights. STC’s production of Dracula, starring Cynthia Erivo, on London’s West End. Daphne du Maurier’s novel Rebecca is revered within the gothic horror canon, alongside her short story The Birds.

Du Maurier’s ‘The Birds’ is a tight, terrifying tale written and set in Cornwall, in the 1950s. This is post-war England. Men and women that fought against fascism and survived the blitz. The story focuses on Nat, his unnamed wife and their children, Johnny and Jill.

Without warning, the birds begin to flock, and attack. They gather, out to sea, in the winter fields. Driven by the east wind. Besieging the family. Drawing blood with stabbing beaks.

Nat is more prepared that his distant neighbours. He observes and acts. Others fall victim to the birds, their bodies left lying in and around their homes.

Alfred Hitchock’s classic chiller ‘The Birds’ followed in 1963, shifting the action to Bodega Bay, California. Hitchcock took the title and the concept and had Evan Hunter (better known by his pen name, Ed McBain) rewrite the story.

Hitchcock’s movie centres on socialite Melanie Daniels (Tippi Hedron’s debut) and lawyer Mitch Brenner (Rod Taylor) as the birds attack and they struggle to survive and keep Brenner’s mother Lydia and young sister Cathy alive. (Interesting side note: Cathy is played by teen Veronica Cartwright, who went on to play Lambert in Ridley Scott’s classic sci-fi horror, Alien.)

In 2026, Belvoir presents Malthouse Theatre’s production of ‘The Birds,’ directed by Matthew Lutton (The Return, Picnic at Hanging Rock, The Bloody Chamber) and adapted Louise Fox (Glitch, Tartuffe, The Trial)

Lutton and Fox decided to transpose the story to Australia, to a small seaside town somewhere in Victoria, bringing the action up to date with mobile phones, pandemics and conspiracy theories.

Australia is the only country in the world to fight, and lose, a war against birds. In 1932, the military, armed with Lewis machine-guns, were sent to Western Australia to defend the wheatbelt in the Great Emu War. Australia is legendary for its deadly fauna from funnel web spiders and red-bellied black snakes to sharks and stonefish. Birds and quokkas are among the few things that aren’t trying to kill you.

Despite the Australian setting, the attacking birds are predominantly the gulls and gannet of Du Maurier’s short story. I’ve seen sulphur-crested cockatoos eat a trampoline and hack through wire screen doors with hooked beaks and talons. We never hear these natives in the soundscape. No screeching cockatoos or menacing kookaburra laughter. I’m afraid that if Australia’s birds suddenly turned murderous, we wouldn’t survive the 80-minute duration of the play.

 

 

Lutton and Fox’s decision to make this a one-woman show, casting Paula Arundell (The Master and Margarita, Harry Potter and the Cursed Child) was a masterstroke.

Arundell leads as Tessa. She is Nat’s unnamed wife from Du Maurier’s short story given the name of Melanie Daniel’s unseen aunt from Hitchcock’s movie. Arundell shifts roles and voices as Tessa talks to her husband, children and neighbours. This is a choice – and like Vegemite you may love or hate it. For me this jumping between roles was a misstep, dragging us out of the building tension, throwing the focus away from Tessa to other characters that will never be fully realised. In an 80-minute show, every moment away from that central character is a loss and the zig zagging was distracting.

The adaption introduces other issues. Australianisms and moment of humour pierce the rising tension, deflating the horror. We lose the gradual building terror of Du Maurier’s original story, where she deftly escalates from waves of small birds to gulls and gannet, and the grim finality of the birds of prey with their sharp beaks and deadly talons. There was no light comedy to dull that horror. Do 2026 audiences need respite or giggles?

Warnings in the programme include coarse language, and graphic descriptions of violence, harm and death. The coarse language is grating. Does a play really need the F-word and C-word thrown around to be contemporary or authentic? They added nothing but took a lot. Likewise, Fox’s graphic and gory descriptions of the dead and dying add little but shock value. The audience’s imaginations can conjure these horrors without a list of brutal injuries and mutilated body parts.

This is a production with no actual birds. No animatronics, no puppets, no projections. The bird attacks are conjured with stabbing sound and fierce white light. The effect is visceral and nothing short of brilliant. Lighting Designer, Niklas Pajanti, and Composer and Sound Designer, J. David Franzke’s collaboration is breathtaking.

Kat Chan’s set appears minimalist at first glance. Three white windows and pitch-black staging. The outline of Tessa’s house as a raised platform. The inclusion of a treadmill felt like a gimmick. When Arundell is running for her life, it sadly looks more like she’s jogging at a 24-hour gym. (Useless fact: Hitchcock used a treadmill on a soundstage for the scene where the schoolchildren flee the crows. They ran on a treadmill, in a cage, while handlers threw live birds at their heads!) Chan’s set extends above Arundell’s head as the roof threatens to cave in on Tessa. I may have imagined it but there seem to be black bird boxes hiding among the stage lights. Black roofs, holes cut in their sides, like little gothic haunted bird houses.

Paula Arundell is a force to be reckoned with. Horror is often looked down on as a genre. But Australian actors have taken horror roles as an opportunity to shine. Nicole Kidman in The Others. Toni Collette in Hereditary. Samara Weaving in Ready or Not. Naomi Watts in The Ring. Essie Davis in The Babadook. Paula Arundell appeared in Late Night with the Devil. She plays Tessa as the final girl, initially confused and afraid but gradually adapting and finding her power, fighting back to protect the ones she loves.

Arundell’s barnstorming performance, and the lighting, sound and set design lift this production, creating a gothic horror for the post-pandemic, post-truth age.

To book tickets to The Birds, please visit https://belvoir.com.au/productions/the-birds/.

Photographer: Brett Boardman

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

A Very Welcome Pinter Production

The Homecoming

The Homecoming Rating

Click if you liked this article

5

Kult Klassic’s production of Harold Pinter’s, ‘The Homecoming’, is an absolute triumph. This play set in 1960s London, depicts a dysfunctional family with its many complexities. All the characters bring a provocative undercurrent of struggle. Pinterseque dialogue is like no other. The audience needs to be shocked and taken out of their comfort zone. Co-Directors, Lola Carlton and Bora Celebi have the actors working at the peak of their powers. The result is intense. We are gripped.

Max (Neil O’Donnell), the brutal patriarch, wields his walking stick around the home. Even with declining mobility, the stick is used as a weapon. Max has his sons Lenny (Alejandro Sarmiento Castro), a menacing pimp, and Joey (Harrison Down) a demolition worker by day and a trainee-boxer by night, living with him. Sam (Linton Atlas), Max’s brother, is non-threatening and polite. Sam is a chauffeur and is allowed to stay in the home, whilst he still brings in a steady income and the occasional gift from clients.

Max’s wife Jessie has died. There is a lack of femininity in the household. Max refers to Jessie often. Sometimes fondly, sometimes cruelly. It depends on Max’s mood. All the men, except Sam, see women in a derogatory manner.

Unexpectedly, Teddy, (Tate Wilkinson Alexander), the eldest son arrives, after a six year absence. Teddy is a Doctor of Philosophy in America and has a glamorous wife, Ruth (Danette Potgieter). Together they have three sons.

Ruth has an immediate effect on the men of the household. They all become intoxicated by her and Teddy is powerless. Ruth enjoys the male attention and swoons in their presence. Max and Lenny offer her a work proposal. The role of prostitute for a few hours a day, in her own flat, followed by doing some domestic duties in the family home.

 

 

When Max, Lenny and Joey, literally fall at her feet, Ruth dismisses Teddy. He leaves. Ruth has abandoned him and their boys, to be swept up my male adoration. The audience questions who has the real power here. Ruth or the men? It’s a provocative question. Is Pinter being misogynistic or is he showing that men are somehow under Ruth’s spell.

In many ways, it’s a shocking ending. A wife abandoning her husband and children, to be a prostitute is alarming. Several audiences members were gobsmacked. That’s the magic of Pinter. He takes an absurdist stance and then challenges us.

Neil O’Donnell is convincing as the cantankerous Max. We believe his intimidating presence. O’Donnell makes the monstrous Max, seem real. Alejandro Sarmiento Castro is dazzling as Lenny. Castro reminds me of a young Robert De Niro. Utterly charming, yet, able to play sinister at the same time. When Lenny laughs his prolonged laugh, it’s scary. Sam (Linton Atlas) provides an eloquent counterbalance to Max. Tate Wilkinson Alexander exudes an academic nerdiness as Teddy. The Doctor of Philosophy has achieved much acclaim, but his achievements are not valued back at home. Alexander carefully brings the necessary sense of vulnerability to this role. Danette Potgieter entrances as Ruth. Potgieter reminds me of a young Uma Thurman in a Tarantino creation. She is quite beguiling. Harrison Down as Joey, conveys vulnerability and some thuggery, as the young man grapples with self identity.

Bronte Taylor’s set is perfect. It sets the mood of a male-dominated home. Studio One in the Esme Timbery Creative Lab at the University Of NSW, is an ideal venue for this play. The audience is up-close-and-personal. Occasional wafts of herbal cigarettes smoked on-stage, titillate our nostrils. Kult Klassic Productions is an exciting new company, that deserves our patronage.

To book tickets to The Homecoming, please visit https://events.humanitix.com/the-homecoming-kult-klassic/tickets.

Photographer: whtvrlolawantslolagets

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

84 Charing Cross Road

84 Charing Cross Road

84 Charing Cross Road Rating

Click if you liked this article

0

If you haven’t read the book, and it is a true story, you have missed out but the second best thing is seeing the play. It captures post war Britain still recovering, short on food, living on coupons and making sense of the previous world war. As the play develops we are taken through England’s important historical moments including Queen Elizabeth’s coronation and celebration.

On the other side of the world, in fast-paced New York, a dollar-poor screen writer becomes a beloved contact to first one and then all in a small London vintage bookshop. It is a joy to hear such witty retorts but also to witness the gentle relationship between brash New York and formal London both in changing times for their countries and lives. Letters are exchanged as books are requested and as years go by, the audience witnesses changes in lifestyle and relationships from a formal correspondence to a warm and witty friendship. The audience audibly responded with laughter and sadness as the letters were read and reacted to.

 

 

The set was wonderfully lit in warm tones with the bookshop and New York apartment juxtaposed to represent the changing lives of both cities and characters. The set and costume designer had sourced and found genuine or reproduction clothes, jewellery, hats and even seamed stockings that set the era and style so authentically. Floor to ceiling shelves of books enhanced the feeling of being in a bookshop whilst the New York apartment was decorated in a more modern style. There was an intimate connection between the audience and actors being in the round giving the feeling of entering each world.

All actors were believable but the two main actors representing the writer, Helene Hanff and Frank Doel, the bookstore manager, captured the audience’s attention from the start. Helene presented a genuine New York strong accent and for those who have lived in New York, the body language, phrases and pace of delivery rang true. Frank wore the British suits and accent and politeness revealing a deeper side to him as their friendship evolved. The cameo actors were true to their time and the sense of a ‘family’ of colleagues revealed itself as each character interacted with Helene’s letters. Their non-verbal body language was at times funny and at other times, poignant but totally believable. The audience cared for each character and wanted to know about their dreams and aspirations. Knowing that the book is true made us want to find out what happened to each person in the future.

The play showed how well-written dialogue taken from genuine letters creates an atmosphere and audience connection with no clever props or actions required. It was the opening night and the actors and director were rewarded by a standing ovation and loud applause.

To book tickets to 84 Charing Cross Road, please visit https://www.ensemble.com.au/shows/84-charing-cross-road/.

Photographer: Prudence Upton

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Three Sisters – Chekhov

Three Sisters

Three Sisters Rating

Click if you liked this article

3

We were in for an intense and emotional rollercoaster that is always Chekhov and we got it. The set established the mood with an atmospheric living room and dining area reminiscent of a late nineteenth century painting with curios and antiques shadowed and lit according to the changing dynamics of the play. Chairs, tables and a piano would become central to the changing dynamics of a tight-knit family in the wrong place. Music was beautifully performed adding a melancholic mood adding to the underlying sadness as the dining table was changed for different times of the day reflecting the changing circumstances.

Enter the actors all strong in their own ways and at times challenged not to upstage each other with the drama of each revelation. As the family evolved, we started with a celebration and the characters established themselves in their best light and costumes as if anything were possible and personal dreams were almost real. The three sisters formed the core as the male characters danced around them reacting as disillusionment set in over the years. Dreams came and went and some of the wrong goals became reality with a realisation of the saying, ‘Be careful what you ask for, you may get it’.

 

 

The oldest sister, already slightly worn with responsibility was played by an actor who made the character believable and maintained a sense of sympathy from the audience as she struggled with others’ decisions that impacted upon the family’s fortune and frustration. The middle sister, strongly acted, was all suppressed passion, erupting eventually and then left with the scars of untempered desire. The youngest was presented as confident and fresh as a daisy being courted by a couple of men and presenting the first stirrings of the Russian future of work being the goal and reason for living only to find that it is just labour and not love. All female actors offered different facets of the sense of lack of control ending in a fractured life and family.

The male characters were equally strong and believable if occasionally upstaging others due to the bombastic nature of the character. The dream Colonel who offered a romantic view of life probably more than anyone, saw unhappiness as the main result of being. The idolised brother who quickly falls of his pedestal, marries the wrong woman disturbing the household and failing at his dreams ending in emptiness. The Baron who loves the youngest sister and as with the others, makes a choice that would impact upon his life. The minor characters offered a backdrop to a household that is struggling with identity, living with rose-coloured glasses of their past life in Moscow and refusing to see what is evolving around them.

The audience laughed, squirmed, became irritated and responded to the oncoming disillusionment as each character fell apart and the ending left asking for more and what happens to them next?

To book tickets to Three Sisters, please visit https://www.oldfitztheatre.com.au/three-sisters.

Photographer: Robert Miniter

Spread the word on your favourite platform!