YENTL

Yentl

Yentl Rating

Click if you liked this article

The Kadimah Yiddish Theatre has done something extraordinary with their story of Yentl – now showing at the Playhouse at the Sydney Opera House: they have reclaimed Isaac Bashevis Singer’s original story and made it sing in a way that the 1983 musical adaptation could not.

I came into the show with high expectations. When I discovered Singer’s short stories as a teenager, they were revelatory for me. His folk tales, full of customs and characters I didn’t know, were yet more real to me than the Anderson and Grimm tales I’d grown up with. All the demons and sprites in Singer’s stories are simply people with desires and faults driven to extremes. His fairy tales reveal human nature.

It is that spirit that this production captures. Stepping into the world of Yentl is to enter a fairy tale realm. The ground is covered in dirt, rocks and grass, a kind of haunted forest. Everything is just slightly exaggerated, including the actors with their white pantomime makeup. This is not a real world; it is beyond the real, ultra real, super real. And by adhering closely to Singer’s story, published in 1962 and set in 1873, it is also profoundly modern.

 

Yentl is a young woman who wants to study and yearns for all the benefits that men have. After the death of her father, she takes on a male name – Anshl – and garb, and goes to study at a yeshiva, on the way meeting the melancholic Avigdor who will become her best friend and study partner. As Avigdor pines for Hodes, his betrothed bride whose family rejected him, he suggests that Anshl marry her instead. What could possibly go wrong? Especially as the spark between the two young men feels like it could be something more than friendship.

Amy Hack does a superb job of playing both Yentl and Anshl. She captures Anshl’s eagerness and excitement to be in the world of men, despite being woefully ignorant of men themselves. Her assumed boyishness gradually transforms into something else – something more powerful as Yentl finally realises what she can and can’t have. Nicholas Jaquinot and Genevieve Kingsford are also excellent as Avigdor and Hodes respectively, characters that could easily be one-dimensional but which they both give great depth to.

An interesting addition to the story is Evelyn Krape’s Figure, or yeytser ho’re, who is witch, fairy, joker and conscience all rolled into one. She propels both Yentl and the narrative forward with an unrelenting energy.

Whether on purpose or not, I found that the Figure the queerest character in a cast full of very queer characters. She captures the torment and joy that being queer often feels like – especially in times or places of repression. And let’s face it: everyone in Yentl is a bit queer. Anshl doesn’t want to be a wife, but is fine with being a husband, and you suspect he even quite likes it. Avigdor, for all his loud proclaiming of how much he loves the female form, is definitely more than a little in love with his (male) friend. And Hodes, sweet Hodes, virtuous Hodes, loves that Anshl doesn’t smell or act like the other boys she’s met.

 

What I particularly loved about this adaptation is that it doesn’t shy away from Yentl’s complicated desires. It is not only that she wants what men have – books and a wife – but she also rejects the feminine. She doesn’t want to be a wife, she doesn’t want to cook someone else’s bread, she doesn’t want to give up her life. And yet she desires both Avigdor and Hodes, and wants to be both male and female. If god created Eve from Adam, then Adam was already both male and female. And if Adam was created in god’s form, then that means god is also both male and female. Mic drop.

In the final part of the show, when Yentl rejects her shame, takes off her male garb and binds her tefillin, it is a beautiful act of defiance. I don’t have to choose, she indicates. This is my body and this is who I am.

You’re damn right, Yentl.

YENTL runs until the 10th November. Book your tickets for one of the remaining performances @ https://www.monstroustheatre.com.au/current-projects/yentl

    Tuesday 22 October 2024 6:00pm^
    Wednesday 23 October 2024 7:15pm
    Thursday 24 October 2024 7:15pm
    Friday 25 October 2024 7:15pm
    Saturday 26 October 2024 1:30pm
    Saturday 26 October 2024 7:15pm
    Sunday 27 October 2024 3:00pm
    Tuesday 29 October 2024 6:00pm
    Wednesday 30 October 2024 7:15pm
    Thursday 31 October 2024 7:15pm
    Friday 1 November 2024 7:15pm
    Saturday 2 November 2024 1:30pm
    Saturday 2 November 2024 7:15pm
    Sunday 3 November 2024 3:00pm
    Tuesday 5 November 2024 6:00pm
    Wednesday 6 November 2024 1:30pm
    Wednesday 6 November 2024 7:15pm
    Thursday 7 November 2024 7:15pm

    Photographer: Jeff Busby

    This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

    Spread the word on your favourite platform!

    Feared and Revered – The Women of Shakespeare

    Feared and Revered - The Women of Shakespeare

    Feared and Revered – The Women of Shakespeare Rating

    Click if you liked this article

    1

    ‘Feared and Revered—the Women of Shakespeare’ at the Genesian Theatre amalgamates several of Shakespeare’s well-known characters, scenes, and plays with modern backdrops and ideologies. The play, written and directed by Tui Clark, transports its audience to a place where Shakespeare’s women are allowed to have complexities and contradictions all at once, other than the usual good/bad, married/unmarried dichotomies.

    The Genesian Theatre itself added to the essence of performance. The beautiful stained-glass windows and intimate size made it easy to become part of the story, especially when actors would situate themselves in or around the audience for entrances or exits.

    It was interesting to see how different soliloquies and passages were paired together to create a tapestry of womanhood and femininity of the past and present. I also loved the simplicity of the props and costuming. A tie or a feather boa was enough to symbolise a different character and the location in which these women found themselves together. I especially loved the technical elements that added to the themes of each scene. Layering voices that led into a beautiful delivery of ‘All the World’s a Stage’, from As You Like It to begin the show was a beautiful tie-in with the ‘stages’ of womanhood that followed.

    The cast was an incredible collective of women who brought to life 30 women across Shakespeare’s collection of works. It was difficult at times to understand what was being said, but it made it feel more authentic, as a lot of Shakespearean language was completely made up. All audience members were in the same boat when it came to simply listening to the dialogue rather than taking in the context in which it was being said.

     

    Some of the more famous monologues or characters were much easier to spot, but the lesser-known characters or plays had to be viewed in context. It’s important to remember that you’re not supposed to grasp the meaning behind each word spoken immediately, but the way the words are spoken and in which scenes they’re performed in.

    Among the talented cast, Liz Grindley stood out with an exceptional stage presence and managed to capture the essence of Cleopatra (among others) in her final moments. The ease with which she moved around the stage and carried each woman in her words and body made it difficult to look away from her, even when she was not speaking.

    Charlotte Bromley gave her all to each character, whether the provocative Witch from Macbeth or the hysterical and grieving Ophelia. Bromley captured the audience’s attention and gave them a performance that transcended language.

    The closing monologue from Taming of the Shrew, performed by Ali Bendall, was delivered with such reverence and emotion that I had to immediately go and search it up just to read it again. Despite obviously being written by Shakespeare several hundred years ago, Bendall made it her own. In those few moments, I was completely in awe of what was coming out, and you could have told me that she wrote it herself or went off script to say what she was thinking, and I would have believed you.

    I recommend grabbing a ticket for yourself and some friends and family to see this beautiful performance before the curtain closes. Even if you don’t know a lot of Shakespeare, these women bring their own elements to the timeless dialogue that draws you in and captivates.

    Don’t miss out on these remaining performances – Wednesday, 23rd, and Thursday, 24th October at 7:30pm and Saturday, October 26th, at 2:30pm.

    Grab your tickets from https://GENESIAN.sales.ticketsearch.com/sales/salesevent/138915

    This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

    Spread the word on your favourite platform!

    Wife – An Exploration

    Wife

    Wife Rating

    Click if you liked this article

    4

    What is the meaning of the word Wife? Australian playwright, Samuel Adamson’s script, explores gender roles and expectations of marriage through four-time chapters and three generations, taking us back to our past and into the future.

    New Theatre’s production of Wife begins in 1959, with a fraught dialogue between a husband and wife behind the closed door of a house. We are eavesdroppers at the disintegration of a traditional marriage. We learn that this is a play within a play – the closing act of A Doll’s House, written by Henrik Ibsen and first published and set in 1879. Nora makes the decision to leave her husband and three children in search of freedom – and it is this ‘unthinkable act’ of a woman where the audience first gets to explore the role of a wife.

    Daisy, portrayed by Imogen Trevillion, and her husband go backstage and meet with Suzannah, played by Julia Vosnakis. It is here that Robert, portrayed with scathing disdain by Will Manton, lets loose his opinion on what a dreadful woman Nora was for leaving her family. His demands on his wife and the way he speaks to her echoes the male chauvinistic attitudes that were the norm in marriages. Have expectations changed in 80 years from 1879? It seems not, in 1959.

    When Robert leaves, we see that Daisy and Suzannah are secret lovers. Daisy, similarly to Ibsen’s character Nora, have followed society’s expectations at the expense of personal truths, and in Daisy’s case, her sexual identity. Daisy, who is pregnant, is at crossroads and her decision flows on to the next generations.

    In the second chapter, set in 1988, two characters sit at a bar following the performance of A Doll’s House. Daisy’s son Ivar (Will Manton) is proudly, and loudly openly gay, and Eric, played by Henry Lopez Lopez, is more in the closet than Ivar. This is a scene where the intensity of the actors’ performances impressed me. One line particularly, which Ivar throws at Eric that he was so “deep in the closet you’re in Narnia!” was well appreciated by the audience. It was interesting to see that Ivar appeared to be quite the bully to his partner Eric, and I drew parallels between Ivar and his father Robert. Relationship inequities still exist, in both heterosexual and homosexual relationships.
    Society had changed by 1988, and people were free to be themselves in public. But even so, they were still being treated with open hostility and discriminated against by the pub landowner, played by Pete Walters.

    In 2019, a couple – Clare (Imogen Trevillion) who is Eric’s daughter, and her fiancé Finn (Will Manton) meet after seeing a production of A Doll’s House, where Cas (Henry Lopez Lopez) plays the lead in a gender flip version of Nora. Cas’ partner, who he calls his wife, is Ivor (now played by Pete Walters). Henry’s Cas is flamboyantly camp, and makes the audience laugh with his toast, “Come in your eye!”. The dialogue and interaction between him and Clare is wickedly sharp when talking about evolving – “the world is still made out of prison cells”.

     

    Clare, desperate to know more about her father, has been searching and desperately wants to know more about him, via the man her father truely loved and called a “Firebrand”. Here we delve into middle-aged Ivar, who we last saw at the bar in 1988; a man who was once passionate about gay rights who fought against homosexual discrimination, and is now complacent. Cas now appears to be the leading partner. We hear from Clare how Eric changed throughout the years since we had last seen him, no longer in the closet but fighting against discrimination.

    The last act takes place in 2042, where Clare’s daughter Daisy (Imogen Trevillion) goes backstage to see Susannah (Julia Vosnakis), after a performance of Ibsen’s play. Keep a look out for the significance of the tambourine!

    Aibhlinn and Burley Stoke’s costume design placed the characters well into multiple time periods. Dr David Marshall-Martin’s set design of The Dollhouse morphed well into the dressing room and pub scenes. The use of a flower trellis in the final scene was effective in it’s simplicity and I felt was a nod to Daisy.

    Wife is a deliciously layered play with many characters through the timelines, and the actors portraying multiple characters did so with visual authenticity. They were quick with the dialogue, with Will, Imogen and Peter slipping into their multiple three characters with ease.
    The connections between family, if a tad confusing during the first act, become clear in the second act, with the links and characters continuing to tie the story together. The complexity and depth of the story made me want to keep going back to ponder this play after it had finished.

    Wife was directed by Darrin Redgate (Boyslikeme Productions) who skilfully pulled together this play to create a thought provoking production with a deep exploration into equality in marriage, gender roles, and societal expectations. Darrin’s vision of Wife and the cast and creative team will have the audience questioning the role of a wife, queer rights and how change can happen over a lifetime.

    Wife is playing at the New Theatre, 542 King St, Newtown.

    Show Run: Wed 8 Oct – 2 Nov 2024

    Tickets: from $32- $37

    Running Time: 2 hours 25 minutes (including interval)

    www.newtheatre.org.au/wife

    Photographer: Bob Seary

    This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

    Spread the word on your favourite platform!

    Jane Eyre: Brings The House Down

    Jane Eyre

    Jane Eyre Rating

    Click if you liked this article

    Genesian Theatre is going out with a bang with this endearing production of Jane Eyre. Like its titular character, the show is small and mighty, brimming with confidence, and is a fine send off before the theatre relocates to its new premises.

    I’m not an easy critic when it comes to Jane Eyre. The novel by Charlotte Bronte is one of my childhood favourites, and I was fortunate enough to catch Sally Cookson’s tremendous adaptation at the Bristol Old Vic ten years ago. But writer/director Ali Bendall’s version, brought to life here, is an honest and enjoyable romp through Jane’s life, which steers away from the more dire moments and instead concentrates on the protagonist’s wit and resilience.

    Orphaned Jane, played by the spirited Kyra Belford-Thomas, manages to escape her nasty aunt’s home by getting herself sent to school at Lowood. There, she transforms into an educated young lady, but teaching at the school still feels like a trap. Jane longs to escape her cage and sets off to become a governess at Thornfield Hall, where she soon falls in love with the enigmatic Mr Rochester, played with bristling charm by Vincent Andriano. The play is backed by a strong supporting cast, who occasionally do double duty as schoolgirls (regardless of age or gender).

     

    The set makes full use of the Genesian’s unique layout, with the stained glass on magnificent display and secret doors and windows creaking open. There’s a great deal of stuff on stage, knickknacks and bric-a-brac, which are brought out to serve as tables, chairs, library books, or whatever else is needed. The multiple levels and entrances give the small stage a lovely sense of dynamics and movement.

    Brendall notes in her forward that this version aims to highlight Jane’s wit, and so our heroine frequently breaks the fourth wall to address the audience. This is meant to be a parallel to the way Jane conveys her story in the novel (“dear reader”), but for me it didn’t quite work. Scenes that should be full of tension, a long look between Jane and Rochester, for example, are broken by Jane turning to us and explaining what she’s feeling. Instead of frisson, the moment fizzles out. It’s an injustice to the actors that we don’t get to ascend those heights of feeling with them.

    That aside, it’s a highly enjoyable adaptation. I can understand why certain narrative cuts were made, and they don’t detract from the overall arc. Jane’s love for Rochester feels rushed, but we can forgive a few shortcuts in the name of romance.

    This was my first time visiting the Genesian, and I’m disappointed not to have caught more shows here before it moves on to its new premises. Jane Eyre is a high-calibre, thoughtful, and spirited production that is a delight, whether you’re a fan of the novel or not.

    For Jane Eyre tickets, please book at Genesian Theatre

    Season: 5th Oct – 10th Nov 2024
    Friday and Saturday nights at 7.30pm
    Sunday matinée at 4.30pm

    Running Time: 3hrs 5mins including 20min interval

    This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

    Spread the word on your favourite platform!