Show Review: Melbourne International Elvis Festival 2024

ELVIS PRESLEY The Legend Lives On: 55 to 77

ELVIS PRESLEY The Legend Lives On: 55 to 77 Rating

Click if you liked this article

1

The 2024 Melbourne International Elvis Festival staged at the National Theatre in St Kilda offers a 3-hour-long time capsule, transporting Elvis fans back to the pinnacle era of star-studded rock n’ roll. The show is performed by five Elvis tribute artists descending on Melbourne from around the globe, each offering a unique portrayal of the dazzling American icon.

Moses Snow opened the production with vibrant charisma and a youthful glow symbolic of the early success of Elvis. Snow staged choreography unparalleled to any other performer of the night and invigorated the theater with his electric spirit. Snow aptly included “Blue Suede Shoes” in his set, which ultimately became one of the most memorable numbers of the night, and prepared the audience for further exhilaration.

Ted Torres closed the first act with a medley of songs derived from the 1968 ‘Comeback Special’. Torres performed a vocally powerful act, though the high number of hits performed was somewhat disproportionate to his crowd interaction resulting in a slight lack of connection. The artist radiated Elvis best in his ballad covers of ‘Memories’ and ‘If I Can Dream’.

Opening the second act was star-studded, all-round performer Jay Dupuis. Dupuis is the winner of several Elvis tribute accolades and is recognized as Graceland’s Ultimate Elvis Tribute Artist World Champion. Such distinguished achievements were on full display throughout his set, with highlights including “I Want You, I Need You, I Love You” and “In The Ghetto”.

Dupuis is adorned with a natural ability to charm and tease the audience, with impeccable improvisational ability to allure crowd members and create a genuinely magnetic experience. Dupuis was the first act of the night to hand out scarves as Elvis did throughout the 1970s, making him an instant fan favorite.

Bruno Nesci performed an enjoyable set with clear confidence and conviction as Canada’s first performer to make it to the Top 5 in the Ultimate Elvis Contest. Nesci conveyed genuine interest in his Melbourne audience and mastered the art of creating interpersonal connections through dialogue. “You Gave Me A Mountain” was particularly memorable for his strong vocal abilities and commitment to the iconic aura of Elvis.

David Lee closed the production with everlasting energy, impressing audiences with his ability to sustain momentum toward the end of the third hour. Lee candidly introduced his wife to the audience before memorably performing “Can’t Help Falling In Love”.

Overall, the show had moments of awe, excitement, and charm, but ultimately ran past its prime, and could have benefited from each artist performing a slightly shorter set. A curtain call of all performers would have worked well to increase the feel of a well-rounded Elvis tribute rather than encourage a comparative analysis of each performer. The show was also let down in part by inconsistencies in sound and lighting. A strange faltering light frequently distracted the show and microphone audio issues caused hassle for the performers, provoking ongoing rambling from the audience.

Besides some shortcomings, what was most special about the show was witnessing such commitment to the aura of Elvis, which embodied connection, charm, and seduction of the female gaze. The show overall had moments of genuine joy and lust which so wonderfully opened the world of Elvis to younger audiences, and celebrated the remembrance of fond memories for long-time fans.

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Home, I’m Darling: Pastel Paradise or Prison?

Home, I’m Darling Rating

Click if you liked this article

5

Laura Wade’s Olivier Award-winning comedy Home, I’m Darling is simply spiffy!

After finding herself newly free from a high powered job, Judy (Amelia Conway) and her husband Johnny (Daniel Ferris) jointly make a decision to create their own ‘happy place’ – a 1950’s home where Judy revels in keeping a spotless house and greeting her trilby wearing husband at the door with a cocktail and a smile.

Joy Sweeney’s set design of the couple’s living room and pastel paradise kitchen, complete with 50’s everything was charmingly inviting. Kudos to Luke Wallyn, for set construction and to the 12 set builders who were able to make the stage look spacious. The front door being elevated along the back end stage so that the audience could clearly see the entry and exit of characters was a good design; split levels in homes were common at the time.

The opening scene, complete with the gingham wallpaper, white lace billowy kitchen window curtains, boxy lavender refrigerator and oven were tied together to create a fresh background as Judy serves Johnny his toast, tea and eggs. They smile sweetly at each other, bantering about how, as Johnny says, they are “sickeningly happy”, showing their perfect smiles to the audience.

I can almost see them on a television toothpaste advertisement with a ‘Ting’ sound effect, and a bright sparkle appears on Johnny’s tooth when he winks at the audience. This play begins not dissimilar to a sitcom, complete with upbeat 1950’s music that reminds me of Samantha and Darren in Bewitched. Sound design music by Geoff Young and Charlotte Wiltshire were spot on throughout the duration of the play, echoing the character’s moods and expanding the play’s authenticity.

Early on, the audience is first introduced to the fact that this play is not actually set in the 1950’s, but is indeed a created make-believe 1950’s house. When Judy pulls out a laptop from the cupboard after Johnny goes to work, combined later with the loud, sharp and demanding incoming text message sounds from Johnny’s boss Alex’s (Vanessa Merewether) mobile, these modern technologies are completely incongruous with the house’s styling and feels foreign. These instances were lighter and original moments, which the audience appreciated.

Judy and Johnny’s initial wonderfully flowing 1950’s arrangement, told in 2 Acts, unspools as supporting characters enter, and questions are raised as to whether living and abiding by the rules is truely sustainable in the modern world.

Judy’s hippie-looking single mum Sylvia, played by Maxine Appel Cohen, performs a scene stealer with her impassioned speech to Judy and her stylist friend Fran (Cassandra Gorman). She cannot understand why her daughter has chosen to live as a fantasist in a world she has not actually lived through. Judy, (a self confessed Daddy’s girl), is made to listen as her mum talks about how hard she and other women fought to empower women back then, whilst she and other women had to sit quietly with their mouths silenced, turning a blind eye, as their husbands cheated on them.

She continues how the 1950’s were a time where “they were shit for anyone who wasn’t a straight white man”. This powerful speech was truely effective in bringing the audience into a time post-war, where men were number one and women were considered less respected. Sylvia’s realistic interpretation of how women existed to serve their husbands dinner with a smile and lay out their slippers differed from the romanticised version of her daughter.

Amelia Conway skilfully portrayed Judy as the perfect 1950’s domestic goddess housewife, whose flouncy beautiful skirts expanded as she twirled, much like how her smiles fanned out – despite the ongoing financial hardships that she would be forced to confront with Johnny. I noted that amongst all the serving of food, (Judy was a great hostess- preparing devilled eggs and the perfect chocolate cake) whenever her guests or husband ate, Judy did not touch her food. I wondered if this was her character being the polite housewife who didn’t want to gain weight by eating, to “keep her figure trim”? Or if it was not considered polite to eat with her husband, maybe she had to eat afterwards in her version of this world?

Daniel Ferris’ portrayal of Johnny’s unease with the couple’s commitment to the fantasy life of their expected 1950’s roles was excellent. Growing more and more uncomfortable with the stress of him being the sole breadwinner leads to a feeling of being trapped and imprisoned.

Under the direction of Joy Sweeney, Home, I’m Darling incorporates a tightly put together performance which combines the drama of societal expectations of gender roles, misogynistic behaviour in the workplace that happens even now (showed in a scene by Fran’s husband Marcus, played with slimy ickiness by David Eisenhauer) and the question of ever-changing shifts in marriage. Judy’s ‘Who Am I without the 1950’s housewife role’ is inextricably tied to her identity and she and Johnny must learn that if they want their marriage to thrive, a compromise must be sought – together.

This is a thought provoking play which which left me with visions of Judy’s beautiful 1950’s dresses, and an interesting nostalgic feeling, albeit just like Judy, of a picture perfect 1950’s home complete with dial telephones and Formica kitchen bench tops, even though I have never lived it.
Life would certainly have been different then.

Home, I’m Darling is playing at The Theatre on Chester, Chester St Epping

Running Time: 2 hours, including 20 minutes interval
26 July – 17 August 2024
Tickets $30 concession / $35 full

www.theatreonchester.com.au/home-im-darling

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

The Questions

The Questions

The Questions Rating

Click if you liked this article

State Theatre Company SA proudly unveils the world premiere of the latest collaboration between playwright Van Badham and composer Richard Wise—a modern and heartwarming rom-com that elegantly explores how simple, honest questions can cultivate profound connections and lead to love.

Set against the unique backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, “The Questions” tells the engaging story of a couple whose initial blind date is indefinitely extended due to a lockdown announced just as the visitor is about to make her emergency exit.

As their time together stretches into weeks, and in the absence of any internet or mobile phone coverage, the couple turns to Arthur Aron’s renowned intimacy-building questionnaire, featuring 36 questions designed to pass the time and, in an effort to foster a deeper understanding and acceptance of each other.

Van Badham’s script masterfully combines humour with genuine emotion, delivering dialogue that feels both authentic and relatable. The narrative captures the essence of emotional exploration and connection, with each musical number and piece of dialogue peeling back the layers of the characters, revealing traumas and fostering empathy.

The performances by Chaya Ocampo (Visitor) and Charles Wu (Resident) are compelling and dynamic, and their chemistry illuminates the stage. Their portrayal of a seemingly mismatched couple is both engaging and heartfelt, drawing audiences into their evolving relationship.

The inclusion of the neighbouring rock band adds an additional layer of charm and humour. Their role as observers of the couple’s journey provides a witty counterpoint, while their lively musical contributions enrich the production.

Jeremy Allen’s set design is exemplary, capturing the essence of modern, minimalist living. The compact lounge and kitchenette evoke a sense of social claustrophobia that heightens the intimacy of the narrative. Gavin Norris’s lighting design is particularly effective, creating the illusion of different settings and cleverly adding an urban chic touch with its cityscape backdrop.

Director Mitchell Butel demonstrates remarkable skill, seamlessly blending theatrical and musical elements to bring this vibrant and heartwarming production to life. Even those who are not typically fans of rom-coms or musicals will find themselves captivated by the production’s witty dialogue, clever lyrics, and the powerful message about connection despite differences.

The audience’s response was overwhelmingly positive, with laughter resonating throughout and a standing ovation for the cast. “The Questions” stands as a thoughtful and humorous exploration of human connection in an era dominated by digital facades. It eloquently demonstrates that true beauty lies in the courage to share our authentic selves—flaws and all.

Buy your tickets @ https://statetheatrecompany.com.au/shows/the-questions/ for one of these upcoming performances:-
Mon 5 Aug 2024, 6:30 pm
Tue 6 Aug 2024, 6:30 pm
Wed 7 Aug 2024, 6:30 pm
Thu 8 Aug 2024, 7:30 pm
Fri 9 Aug 2024, 7:30 pm
Sat 10 Aug 2024, 2:00 pm
Sat 10 Aug 2024, 7:30 pm
Mon 12 Aug 2024, 6:30 pm
Tue 13 Aug 2024, 6:30 pm
Wed 14 Aug 2024, 11:00 am
Wed 14 Aug 2024, 6:30 pm
Thu 15 Aug 2024, 7:30 pm
Fri 16 Aug 2024, 7:30 pm
Sat 17 Aug 2024, 2:00 pm
Sat 17 Aug 2024, 7:30 pm

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Let Sleeping Dogs Lie

Sleeping Dogs (2024)

Sleeping Dogs (2024) Rating

Click if you liked this article

Adam Cooper’s directorial debut Sleeping Dogs tries to reckon with jealousy, power, perception, and memory but never reaches the heights of genre classics like Se7en or Memento, which are clear inspirations.

Crowe plays Roy Freeman, an almost aggressively broken man whose recent brain surgery scars dice his scalp, his home littered with masking tape with notes to himself.

It is partially a sobering drama about a broken man suffering a debilitating illness and partially a gritty crime thriller, but never enough of either to satisfy fully. The Alzheimer’s diagnosis that bookends the film is under treatment effectively enough that Freeman is able to solve enough of the mystery for the plot to move forward. Despite this, whilst the final reveal hits more with a whimper than a bang, the story has spent so long focusing elsewhere that it never built the alternatives.

Sleeping Dogs (2024)

The story takes an extended detour into a flashback based on a manuscript that tells a compelling story of the corrupting power of influence, but it struggles to translate it back into the main plot, making it no more impactful on the plot than Freeman’s diagnosis.

Where this film does shine is in tone. The almost drained composition of shots when Freeman is our focal point is starkly contrasted to the vivid manuscript flashback, as author Richard Finn reckons with his perception of the murder and his relationships with Laura Gaines (Karen Gillan), a flighty yet brilliant researcher, and Joseph Wieder (Marton Csokas), a murder victim and manipulative psychologist.

These sections are awash with colour and vibrancy, a comment as to how each of our unreliable narrators is coming to the story and how they are analysing events with their own limited knowledge. Unfortunately, this sequence is front-loaded, and we lose this contrast from that point.

There is enough to satisfy a genre fan, but viewers may be baffled by the leaps it takes to justify a conclusion that didn’t reach the heights it was aiming for.

Sleeping Dogs is now playing in cinemas starting August 1st. Catch it at a cinema near you!

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!