Red Herrings and Sinister Secrets – Agatha Christie’s The Murder of Roger Ackroyd

The Murder of Roger Ackroyd

The Murder of Roger Ackroyd Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

1

Agatha Christie was a prolific author, one of most well-known novelists in history. (In fact, she is considered the third best-selling author of all time, behind William Shakespeare and the Bible) Her 66 detective and 14 short story books have sold over 2 billion copies.

When What’s the Show sent me to review “The Murder of Roger Ackroyd”, I was looking forward to seeing the performance. Adapted by Philip Grecian, directed by Ali Bendall and presented by the Genesian Theatre Company, the play delivered a performance that would make Agatha Christie smile. It was a great choice to have as the first Agatha Christie play in 2026 at their new home in Rozelle.

The Murder of Roger Ackroyd is a play with a large cast. There are fourteen characters played by thirteen people. The first act of the show was dialogue heavy and had me playing catchup with Who’s Who. By the intermission though, I had a grasp on the relationships between the characters. The layout and design of the program was one of the most gorgeous I have seen – well done to the graphic designer. There was a Murder Mystery Bingo page for fun, a list of Possible Suspects and their role, and a Suspects / Motives Evidence Board which helped consolidate the characters for me during the intermission.

The play centres on Dr. James Sheppard (Nathan Moss), a local doctor in the quaint English village of King’s Abbot. He narrates the events surrounding the startling murder of the affluent Roger Ackroyd. A neighbour, known to Dr Sheppard’s sister Caroline (Roslyn Hicks) for throwing marrow over the fence, is the renowned Belgian sleuth Hercule Poirot (Peter David Allison). The famous detective known for his sharp mind and methodical approach becomes entangled in this mystery, even though he is retired. Through clever questioning and careful observation, Poirot works to reveal the real story beneath the surface, interviewing possible suspects and employing his “little grey cells” as he likes to put it, to lead the audience in a suspense-filled classic play.

 

Director Ali Bendall had the daunting task of creating a set with many different locations, and she successfully brought them all to the stage clearly with the use of lighting (Lighting Design by Cian Byrne) props (including a real antique Dictaphone) and variations in using the whole front theatre space. The cast were dynamically moving, including below the stage, in front and to the sides of the audience. The effect of this surprisingly brought the audience close to the action and encompassed us, making us feel a part of the story. Ali was also the Sound Designer and the ominous, dark music during the scene changes added to the whole atmosphere of mystery and threatening going-ons.

The script had some very witty moments throughout the show. Peter shone as bow tie wearing Poirot, the character delivering many lines and play on words which had us laughing. “The game is afeet!” “Hercule Poirot knows!” Roslyn as Caroline, the village gossip, held the audience from the beginning, her cheeky confidence as she bantered with her brother about all the happenings in the village was very funny. She is forgiven when she says, “I don’t pry things out of people!” indignantly, and then proceeds to ask personal questions to another character, indeed prying! John Parker (Peter Hoekstra-Bass) played The Butler who found the murdered Roger Ackroyd. On request from Poirot, his re-enactment with Ackroyd’s niece Flora Ackroyd (Jen Manoogian) was played with great over-enthusiasm, so much so that I thought, “John Parker has just discovered what he wants to do after he finishes his employment as a butler – acting!”

The cast and their British accents were impressive. Combined with Susan Carveth’s costume design, they put just the right emphasis on reeling the audience in and making us wonder who amongst these group of people was responsible for Roger Ackroyd’s death. Particularly during the second act, the red herrings were scattered everywhere, clues were looked for by me, and this became part of the game. It’s typical of an Agatha Christie novel – twisty, sinister secrets revealed slowly, blackmail, with a great ending. I won’t spoil the whodunnit, but when you see this play, (and you definitely should!), look out for the murderer’s pace and delivery – kudos to that actor, and to the whole cast.

The Murder of Roger Ackroyd is playing 16 January – 28 February 2026 at the Genesian Theatre. 2B Gordon Street, Rozelle.
Run Time: 2 hours 30 minutes (including a 20-minute interval)
Tickets: www.genesiantheatre.com.au/events/the-murder-of-roger-ackroyd

To book tickets to The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, please visit https://genesiantheatre.com.au/events/the-murder-of-roger-ackroyd/.

Photographer: Anthony Burns

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Those Life Changing Three Little Words – Elanora Players

Three Little Words

Three Little Words Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

1

Australian Playwright Joanna Murray-Smith’s choice of “Three Little Words” for a title about two couples’ friendship is an interesting one. Initially I assumed that those three little words alluded to “I Love You”. However by the end of the play I realised that those three little words could be interpreted as to whatever the audience thinks – and this was a very clever prelude to a witty script performed by four engaging actors from the Elanora Players.

Tess (Tracey Keene) and Curtis (Paul Sheldon) have invited their long-time besties for dinner on their 20-year anniversary. After reminiscing good naturedly about the many good times and the way they met, Tess and Curtis announce a bombshell in the form of three little words, “We’re Splitting Up”. Bonnie (Karen Oughtred) and her partner Annie (Chantal Harrison) are disbelieving and shocked. The shaking up of what they thought was an unbreakable bond between the four friends sets off a split between all of them, and we are witness to the devastation that unravels.

Tess wants to explore her own identity, apart from being a daughter, wife and mother and yearns for something other than domesticity. She is highly critical of Curtis’ occupation as a teacher (“overqualified and underpaid”) and is constantly irritated by her husband’s habits. Tess is a self-centred woman who desperately wants out of the marriage to see what she could evolve into. She believes that Curtis will be there for her afterward. Tracey portrayed Tess’ selfish character that was quite unlikeable very successfully to the audience.

Initially I found myself feeling sorry for downtrodden Curtis, with his gentle manner and complacency. However, his immediate behaviour following the separation sparks some controversy, as Paul effectively expands his character’s complexity by swiftly entering the dating scene to be with a significantly younger woman. His actions suggest that an amicable separation might be unlikely, and his pointed, hurtful remarks towards Tess diminish my sympathy for him.

 

 

The split is a catalyst for Annie, a masseuse and Bonnie, a high-end art dealer, to suddenly explore their own relationship. Bonnie’s warm and younger partner Annie, who feels Bonnie’s condescending words deeply, was played with a sweet, quiet strength by Chantal.

Karen’s character Bonnie had a mix of forthrightness and vulnerability. Kudos to Karen who held the stage with convincing conviction – Bonnie was a standout character to me.

There’s a recurring reference to and even a custody battle for Tess and Curtis’ tantalus, a wooden lockable stand, which holds whiskey and is inaccessible without a key, to keep it safe from children or from servants in the old days. This heirloom is a gentle representative of how Tess feels, alluding to the Greek myth of Tantalus, who was eternally tempted by food and water just out of reach.

Director Kerrie King’s set was simple and effective, showing two living rooms side by side, their own spaces represented and separated by the use of different coloured walls and furniture. Lighting designer Wayne Chee and Lighting Operator Thomas Van der Plaat highlighted the rooms and characters well, bringing attention to where it was needed. Sound Design and Operator Walter Opdam’s choice of music brought the right atmosphere to the play, especially with his choices of songs such as George Michael’s “Freedom” as Tess was dancing and singing on the couch, and a song I’d never heard about IKEA as Tess attempted (and failed) to put together something from IKEA, after boasting to her friends that she never wanted to have anything personal again!

“Three Little Words” is a portrait of the aftermath of a breakup, of how the dissolving of one couple’s marriage affects their friends unexpectantly. How the dynamics of situations change in ways that are unpredictable because we are human. It is certainly a thought-provoking play, but not a play that is completely sad. In parts yes, but this clever script was laden with so many light moments sprinkled in, delivered by the characters’ wry and quick dialogues which made me and the audience laugh often, and quite a lot!

I loved the Elanora Players’ production of Three Little Words! Perhaps those Three Little Words from the title may have been “I See You” or Annie’s wisdom of “It’s About Kindness”. Or maybe it is meant to mean something else altogether; the audience can make up their own minds and there is creative beauty leaving it like that.

“Three Little Words” run time: approximately 90 minutes, with a 20 minute interval
Jan 9 – Jan 17 2026 at North Narrabeen Community Centre, 2-10 Woorarra Avenue, North Narrabeen
www.elanoraplayers.com.au

To book tickets to Three Little Words, please visit https://elanoraplayers.com.au/.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Much Ado About Nothing

Much Ado About Nothing

Much Ado About Nothing Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

1

This Much Ado About Nothing is set on the South Coast in the week before Christmas, and the choice is not cosmetic. From the moment Don Pedro, Claudio and Benedick enter wheeling a battered esky, the world is established: this is a family gathering, loud, sunburnt, faintly daggy, and thick with history. The cicadas hum, So Fresh Summer Hits blare, and the audience—seated in the round, sometimes beside the actors themselves—is folded directly into the social fabric of the play.

The production leans into deliberate dagginess. Costumes are bright, mundane, occasionally ugly. The set is minimal: a Christmas tree, a party table, a CD player, tinsel slung over exits. Popular music and unpolished dancing create the feeling of a real holiday gathering rather than a theatrical abstraction. In a space this small, there is nowhere to hide—and the production knows it.

Theo Rule’s Benedick is an Australian bloke we recognise instantly. His loud vows of eternal bachelorhood are funny because they’re defensive, half-brag and half-shield. What makes the performance quietly impressive is the vulnerability Rule allows in. As Benedick overhears that Beatrice may love him, the change is gradual, almost reluctant. Armour loosens in stages. Pauses lengthen. Hope creeps in. By the time Benedick acts, his earnestness feels earned, not performative.

Madison Chippendale, who also directs the production, gives Beatrice a different kind of armour. Her wit reads as learned self-protection, shaped by disappointment rather than disdain. When she overhears Benedick’s supposed love, curiosity flickers—but caution holds the line. Her later demand that he prove himself lands not as cruelty but principle. That insistence becomes the moral spine of the play, aligning directly with Benedick’s decision to believe Hero when others will not.

 

 

Andrea Magpulong’s Hero emerges slowly, but when she speaks there is no ignoring her. That restraint makes the wedding scene genuinely shocking. In such close quarters, Claudio’s public shaming feels brutally intimate. James Papadakis plays Claudio as someone painfully familiar: good-natured, not too bright, easily led. His cruelty comes not from malice but weakness, which makes it harder to excuse.

James Yeargain’s doubling of Don Pedro and Don John is smartly executed, though the production’s trimmed structure means Don John’s plot is never fully resolved. This Much Ado prioritises emotional truth over narrative closure, and that trade-off is visible.

The true heart of the production lies in the Beatrice and Benedick scenes. Calling it “chemistry” is inadequate. What plays is collision—two guarded people meeting at force. Love doesn’t bloom here; it crashes.

There is something quietly principled in these choices. Shakespeare did not write for high culture; he wrote for crowded rooms, for people eating, drinking, laughing, and sometimes being cruel to one another. Chippendale’s direction understands this instinctively. By embracing the familiar — the bad taste, the pop music, the awkward dancing, the Christmas rituals everyone recognises — the play is returned to its natural habitat. In this exposed, communal space, the language doesn’t arrive as something precious, but as something overheard. And that is where it belongs.

To book tickets to Much Ado About Nothing, please visit https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1493684.

Photographer: Jamie Simmons

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Tagi o Le Text-Based-Performance-Artist! : Working Class Clown

Working Class Clown

Working Class Clown Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

1

Mmmmmm… conceptual. Such was the tagline of Tommy Misa’s seventy-five minute exploration into grief and culture, Working Class Clown. And yet, what was immediately impressive about the piece, is that it wasn’t. Not really. The show, although tackling conceptual ideas, used Samoan clowning and a deep and grounded connection to the mundanity of life to traverse those ideas with an empathetic intelligence and humour that made sure it never flew too unreachably high into cerebralism. In the towering industrial theatres of Carriageworks, a stage set with what upon first glance looks like nothing more than a pile of leaves and towering poles is nestled. Against the concrete backdrop, they seem almost out of place as natural objects, which, in many ways, becomes the point.

As the piece opened, Misa’s performance strengths became immediately obvious. Misa moved like a dancer, each micro-adjustment fluid and controlled; a charismatic performer with an easy sensuality that spoke to the argument of the piece. Every emotion, confusion, grief, excitement, happiness, sat firmly in his body as the narrator took us through one of the early Samoan myths of creation. As he joined us in the modern day, we were gifted with the stunningly effective costume design of Katie-Louise and Lilian Nicol-Ford, an oversized blue linen shirt and pants that effortlessly elevated Misa’s physical work on stage. This was accentuated once more by Amber Silk’s lighting design, done so well and concentrating each moment so deliciously that I am officially converted against the lights-up lights-down shows I once championed.

As we moved into the modern day, the piece took on its more grounded, honest edge. We joined Misa in line for Centrelink, and felt both their boredom and desperation as the system once again ignored them. Both we, the audience, and Tommy, the performer, coped with this ignoring of our needs through laughter. In front of our eyes, Tommy became the disinterested government worker, the eastern suburb white friend who can never truly understand what poverty feels like, and the teachers who turned their nose up instead of reaching out with understanding.

Each moment, when scratched just beyond the surface of humour relays a tragic institutional truth about our society, and yet, when faced with the reality of what little those of us who are ignored by the system can do about it, our only choice is to laugh. Laughter, in a sense, was the thesis of the piece. Can we decolonize ourselves through laughter? Can we use it to move through grief? Can we use it to heal?

 

 

Another significant throughline of the piece was language. Like many, growing up in primary and high school in Sydney, I was told that most indigenous languages in Australia and the Pacific were either dead, or mostly dead. The hidden underlying message of that wording being, there’s no use bothering to try and save them. Working Class Clown disproved this with a grin and audience participation. As the sole performer on stage, the audience, in many ways, became the secondary character, and our interaction was done almost entirely within the framework of the Samoan language. Through the comedy of the text, and the mass of people learning at the same time, one thought came immediately to my mind: this isn’t that hard. And so I return to comedy as a tool of decolonization.

Perhaps the tragedy of high school and university history classes had told me that imperialism was simply too great a power to ever contend with, but here, in this room of strangers, imperialism showed its delicate white underbelly and revealed to us its weakness of empathy. This also connected us intimately to the culture being explored on stage, and allowed us to almost grieve as a collective, and in turn, provide Misa with the safe space to be as vulnerable as he was.

As a performer, Misa continued to impress. His vocal work was deliberate, and controlled right down to the breath work, which we heard perhaps too much of at the level his mic was set at. Their comedic timing and character work remained a highlight of the show experience, and his subtle shifts into the emotional lowpoints of the script once again proved to me the power of the double-sided coin of comedy and tragedy. Further, the piece sat very culturally inside Sydney, which was a welcome change from the more conceptual shows on the market which are set more inside an “idea” than a place. Towards Misa’s more emotional moments, he did briefly fall into rhythmic traps which leaned more demonstrative than legitimately emotive, however with the content being discussed, I couldn’t truly fault them. It also didn’t stop every emotional moment from giving me full body goosebumps, as we watched legitimate emotions sit just behind the emotional guard of performing.

Lighting also continued to show off, both with moments of individual spotlight, and particularly memorable moments of the lights coming up on us as the audience, forcing us to participate. Another highlight was the voice-message from Gussy, played by Imbi, which was performed beautifully, and gave Misa the break they needed to create the emotional high that would carry them for the rest of the show. However, I must admit my favourite moment, one that brought me fully to tears, was Misa’s retelling of a family in line for housing – which they don’t get – and the gifting of a dandelion from the family’s oldest son to his exhausted mother.

A one-man show is a challenge, it gives you no one to rely on but yourself, and it was here that one of the only two true weaknesses of the show appeared. At a smattering of points throughout the show, Misa began to say something and then rapidly changed direction, which left the sentence not quite making sense. This came to a head as a line drop, which although is not a crime in and of itself, did manifest as a drop in confidence which affected the later half of the show. This, however, I am empathetic about. It is difficult enough to learn a part in an ensemble piece, where there are people on stage that can bail you out. A one-man show is an entirely different beast, and this show was almost half an hour longer than the others I’ve seen this year.

A truly mammoth amount of content for a singular performer. The piece’s second, and truly I believe only other flaw, was that although it made interesting points, the connective tissue between those points was often weak. This problem was much less noticeable in the first half of the piece, but towards the end, as the script tried to fit more and more ideas into itself in dwindling time, the jumps became more and more distinct – which caused confusing pivots between emotional states that didn’t quite make sense. However, each individual idea on its own was well fleshed out and conceptually impressive, even as the larger cohesiveness of the argument began to warp.

Easily the most impressive portion of the show was watching Misa, and then Misa and some brave volunteers from the audience who weren’t wearing wobbly heels like I was, build the world in front of us. This began with Misa building a puppet in real time out of paper, which was used beautifully to represent his child self. However, the second, and more impressive example, was the building of the home. The section began with one of the rawest displays of vulnerability I’ve ever seen on stage, as the lights came up on all of us whilst Misa honestly asked for help to lift the roof onto the poles he’d placed down.

As the home came together, the emotion hidden behind those guardrails of performance crept to the surface, and as the sunset behind the home was created, both Misa and their audience were left in a choked awe (and admittedly misty-eyed). Indeed, it became never-more clear than in that moment that we weren’t just watching a character work through something, but Misa himself process his grief in front of us.

Working Class Clown functions spectacularly as an exploration of grief through comedy and culture, and although it trips on minor faults of performance and argument, as a cohesive experience, it was an incredibly impressive piece of theatre. Each element was well considered and equally well executed, and I left with both a true sense of emotional catharsis, and a deeper understanding of a culture that I hadn’t had the chance to learn much about.

To book tickets to Working Class Clown, please visit https://performancespace.com.au/whats-on/tommy-misa.

Photographer: Joseph Mayers

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Subscribe to What's The Show

Reviews, show news and what is on, straight to your inbox.