Trio Isimsiz

Trio Isimsiz (Musica Viva Australia)

Trio Isimsiz (Musica Viva Australia) Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

3

For anyone who hasn’t seen inside, allow the scene to be set. The Adelaide Town Hall Auditorium is a stunning display of ornate ceilings, marble columns, and a pipe organ on display which serves as the perfect backdrop for performers such as Trio Isimsiz. Turkish for ‘trio without a name’, Trio Isimsiz formed in 2009, have performed widely; been broadcast by BBC Radio in Europe; and have won countless prizes and accolades. The trio have been successful together and individually, with their adoration for their craft seeping from every note they play.

Introductions were not initially needed. The three men took to the stage, bowed to the audience, and sat with their instruments: they were simultaneously cool, calm, and collected while almost vibrating with excitement to begin their performance. With the barest of nods between them, the audience was transported away.

The cellist, Edvard Pogossian, spoke a few words after they had completed the first piece. He named the three pieces they had, and would, perform, and spoke a little about the newest piece by Francisco Coll, written in 2020. Pianist Erdem Mısırlıoğlu and violinist Pablo HernĂĄn BenedĂ­ declined to add anything further, their fingers already twitching towards their instruments.

Each piece which was performed was written by a different composer, and each piece guides the audience through a different journey. We began with an energetic piece by Johannes Brahms (Piano Trio in C minor, Op. 101), before being led into the curious Piano Trio by Francisco Coll. To finish the night, we were treated to the lively story by Franz Schubert (Piano Trio No. 1 in B-flat major, D898).

 

 

If you are unfamiliar with classical music, each piece (specifically for this performance, at least) lasts between 18 and 42 minutes. Do not be fooled when the music dips; it is not yet time to applaud, because the music is changing its tune (no pun intended) into the next movement. But you are never bored! The music ebbs and flows with ease, creating a visceral and immersive experience; each piece bringing forth fresh sounds and imagery, creating a similar, almost ethereal sense you can experience when looking through a kaleidoscope.

The second piece, by Francisco Coll, at the time of this writing, has only been performed for Australian audiences twice; once in Perth, and once in Adelaide. It was commissioned for Trio Isimsiz, after a conversation between their violinist and the composer, and was first performed in January of 2022. The program goes into further details about the piece, the composer, and the Trio, and is well worth the read.

The three performers play with a passion, care, and love for their craft which was tangible even from the dress circle. It was a delight to watch them perform, and an honour to be a part of the second Australian audience to experience Coll’s piece.

If you don’t consider yourself a fan of classical music, this show is still worth checking out. The music is a new experience and a new appreciation for music in general 
 and with three good-looking boys playing so passionately, there are no downsides!

To book tickets to Trio Isimsiz (Musica Viva Australia), please visit https://www.musicaviva.com.au/concert-season/2025/trio-isimsiz/.

Photographer: Dylan Alcock

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Signorinella: Little Miss (Italian Film Festival)

Signorinella: Little Miss (Italian Film Festival)

Signorinella: Little Miss (Italian Film Festival) Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

6

When they began migrating to Australia pre-World War II, Italian’s were given plots of land in the harsh outback to call their own. From there, they worked hard to ensure the land would thrive, build their businesses, and their families. Even while they were labelled as a threat by Australians in 1939, they didn’t let this stop them from building the best version of their lives.

“Signorella: Little Miss” explores how Italian women have contributed to the history of Australia, from fashion to politics, food to art, and almost everything in between. With feminism as the core theme, the interviewees are charming, lively women reminiscing on their stories in Australia, and showing a resilience that can only come from having to repeatedly explain to their friends and acquaintances that good food is so much more than just a Sunday roast of potatoes and carrots.

Through the documentary, we are treated to family pictures – some of which are brought to life, and animated to show smiling faces and happy interactions – showing the lives of the young Italians while they tell their stories. Some of these women were not allowed to leave Italy without first being married, and were married by proxy, with their husbands waiting patiently for them in Australia. We are treated to a beautiful story from one interviewee deciding to come to Australia after seeing a picture of her future husband, and creating a beautiful family together.

“
 sometimes destiny takes you there whether we believe it or not.”

 

 

Some viewers will find it amusing that even then, through well-written letters and years-old photographs, men were catfishing women into marriage. So not many of these proxy weddings were meant to last.

We hear not only from Italian migrants, but also from politicians, activists, magazine editors, chefs, business owners, singers, and more. The women on the screen are inspiring, well spoken, and beautifully dressed. Some chose to speak in Italian, some in English, and some a little of both, but they all share the same passion for their heritage, and their homes.

The focus for the documentary is on how Italian women have been quiet, hard-working building blocks in Australia, but we can’t ignore the stories of how they have been girl-bossing since they found their way to Australia. From keeping their families afloat while the men were taken away to internment camps, to finding themselves smack in the middle of the “man’s world” and refusing to back down, these proud women are an inspiration to everyone.

Through the documentary we are told, and shown, the Italian outlook on life: Anything is possible. And these women prove that.

“Life is most beautiful when it is diverse.” Tina Arena.

To book tickets to Signorinella: Little Miss (Italian Film Festival), please visit https://italianfilmfestival.com.au/films/iff25-signorinella-little-miss.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

When We Dead Awaken

When We Dead Awaken

When We Dead Awaken Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

4

When We Dead Awaken, by Henrik Ibsen, follows the story of Professor Arnold Rubek, his wife, Maia, and his original muse, Irene, as they tackle their relationships, nostalgia, and acceptance of life and death. Ibsen was known to work with self-analytical themes, and When We Dead Awaken is the perfect example; written to make you consider life from the perspective of others, be honest with yourself (and your potentially declining artistic inspiration), morality, and mortality.

True to the time this piece was written, the play has three acts and two intermissions, with the beginning of each act providing a new location, soundscape, and sometimes lighting, for the story.

We join the gravelly-voiced Rubek and his wife as they return to their home country, a lovely soundtrack of birdsong offsetting Frau Rubek’s obvious frustration as she attempts to gain her husband’s attention. We learn the pair are staying at a Norwegian Spa and Mountain Resort, and Professor Rubek is enquiring after a woman in white being followed by a woman in black, whom he saw walking in the middle of the night.

This woman in white, we learn from the well-spoken Hotel Manager, is another guest from the hotel, but the woman is an enigma to the hotel manager. While the Professor is attempting to speak to the woman in white, his wife is enthralled by the life and stories of the loud, and sometimes not too subtly lewd, bear hunter. When the Professor finally has a chance to speak with the woman, it is revealed that the woman was the Professor’s first muse, the artwork of whom made him famous: Irene.

 

 

Irene has a voice of honey, but is not afraid to hold back and raise her voice to scold the Professor when it is needed. During her scenes we are witness to a woman with severe trauma and hysteria (which these days we would recognise as mental illness) doing her best to navigate her way through a life of pain, regret, and lost love, while battling her inner demons.

As the history between the Professor and Irene unfolds, there is a juxtaposition between them reminiscing on the past, and Maia being stubbornly set on future adventures with the bear hunter. The audience is gently rocked between past and present as our eyes ping pong between the characters on stage, glowing under the sunshine-like lights.

The only concern I found was that some of the more intense background sounds in Acts One and Three overwhelmed the voices of those speaking, but I am also aware this was probably done on purpose, because those sounds most certainly achieved their desired effects, and matching sound speaker volume with a human voice is a very fine line.

Each cast member melts into the persona of their character and bounces off their character’s partner with ease, the emotions weaving off the stage being almost palpable. Boasting minimal sets, props, and lighting changes to keep the focus on the characters, the story unfolds gracefully and ends in a way which will keep you thinking about the characters on your drive home.

The director made a creative choice to focus on the relationships between the characters, and some of the characters’ story arcs in Act three have been intentionally left out for the audience’s interpretation. If you are familiar with the play, be sure to come prepared to experience a fresh perspective on the story; if you are unfamiliar, allow the characters to carry you through a past-and-present experience of human nature.

To book tickets to When We Dead Awaken, please visit https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1385262.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Jane “Meta” Austen

The Watsons

The Watsons Rating

★★★★★

Click if you liked this article

2

This is not your typical Jane Austen show. This is meta chaos.

Act I is what you would expect from anything attached to Jane Austen and the regency era; talks of marriage for both love and gain, a ball (complete with dance), proper introductions being made, and fast proposals. But what happens when the author inserts herself into the story and the characters rebel? Act II is a chaotic ride answering just that 
 and then some.

Please note I am calling the actors and actresses “performers” to avoid any unintentional mis-gendering.

The theatre boasts 120 seats, and at the time of the show starting, I could only spot four empty seats in the U-shaped space. This meant there were plenty of people to distract a performer as they laughed at the well-timed, well-delivered jokes. But the performers were professional, and each of them lost within the scene, not appearing to ever notice the loud, or occasionally scattered, laughter.

The stage was deep, but it was not of a typical size or shape. Performers were sometimes standing less than a metre in front of the front row audience, providing an immersive experience for all involved. This U-shape was paired with a second-storey balcony stage, only a few metres deep and appearing as part of the stage structure if you didn’t know any better. The few rows of stairs and the walkways surrounding the seating area were included as part of the stage a few times. Personally, I wish they could’ve had more opportunities from the script to use the walkways and stairs; the creative use elevated and enhanced the experience.

 

 

Being U-shaped was also a downfall for the performers. It can be challenging enough for a performer on stage not to turn their back on the audience, but in this instance, it often couldn’t be helped. Parts of the audience missed out on the comical reactions, the subtle and not-so-subtle facial expressions, and even important prop sightings. It was infrequent, but some moments were stagnant, with performers seeming to forget half the audience was behind them (yes, this did happen on purpose a few times, and it was well blocked for those particular scenes), and I could see audience members straining to spot the speaker. The first interaction between the author, Laura, and our lead, Emma, was alive and energetic, covering the stage and including everyone around them. Understandably, there’s only so much you can do with a space such as this one, and this was the only downfall of the performance that this author noticed. I feel it is important to note that even if the performer’s back was turned, at no point did I struggle to hear or understand what was being said; every performer had a clear voice and pronunciation, even if their characters ran their words together.

In saying that, the cast acted and reacted with and to one another spectacularly. If there were a crowd in the background they brought the foreground scene to life with murmurings, rustles, and reactions to the main speaker. Carefully choreographed scenes were executed so in sync that it seemed natural. They brought not only spoken comedy, but also a varying amount of slapstick and physical comedy to keep the audience on their metaphorical toes.

Helping to keep the audience on their toes were the set changes. While each set was minimalist, stagehands weren’t the ones changing the sets; rather, the performers were. While this was done well, and background noise over the speakers guided the audience into a scene change, some scenes changed so rapidly that it took a moment to catch up. While this worked with the script, when you aren’t expecting it to happen in this style, it can be jarring to begin with. The lighting is perfect for the story, and has few large changes, aside from some spotlights and some coloured choices in the second act, but does little to guide the audience through a set change. As an audience member, we must remember that while Jane Austen would never allow a well-bred member of society to carry their own chair, the meta version of these characters certainly don’t mind.

The costumes were beautifully regency era, and aside from the Redcoats, each character was sporting different colours and accessories to stand out to the crowd. If you aren’t familiar with the characters these costumes were incredibly helpful in keeping up with who was who. There were minimal costume changes, but the big ones that weren’t pointed out by the performers felt like easter eggs for the audience 
 one or two of the dresses even had pockets! The costumes represented the social standing of each character with elegance, tassels, careful embroidery, and well-chosen shoes.

 

As for the characters 
 I am hesitant to say too much and risk ruining anything for the readers. Be prepared to laugh, gasp, sigh, and maybe get a little teary. See the Watson family, in real time, lose some, win some, become appalled, find love, and even lust. Observe the Osborne family derail themselves to become the more interesting, more fulfilling versions of themselves. See side characters take a stand to be more involved in the story, or demand they get to grow and learn their endings; watch a cad find his way in the world; find out that the Redcoats have names; and try to spot Nanny polishing silverware for almost an entire scene.

In summary, everything has been thought of to reflect the (multiple) existential crises happening before you. I found each performer to be captivating, without stealing the spotlight from other cast members – even with some of those spectacular sideburns. Act II has more modern vernacular and is slightly crude (there are content warnings in the programs you can purchase at the ticket booth), but is tastefully done, for the most part. This is meta, this is fourth wall breaking, this is not always polite society, but it is laughing at itself and having fun.

I will say, I feel that one content warning is missing: If you are a writer, be prepared to potentially feel personally victimised by some of Laura’s lines about why writers write.

All in all, the performance begs you to find the answer to the question, “Is that very Jane Austen?”

To book tickets to The Watsons, please visit https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1324505.

Photographer: Richard Parkhill

Spread the word on your favourite platform!