Guards At The Taj: Beauty But at What Cost?

Guards At The Taj

Guards At The Taj Rating

Click if you liked this article

2

This is a tale of deep friendship, loyalty and duty – and beauty. In 1648, two Imperial Guards stand tall, dressed proudly in blue and silver uniforms with their backs to the ornate gate of Taj Mahal. It has been 16 years in construction, made by slaves and craftsmen. It is the morning before the first viewing of the Taj Mahal, which was rumoured to be the most beautiful building in the world. The Emperor Shah Jahan wishes for the Taj Mahal to remain the most beautiful of all and thereby issues a decree to ensure that this beauty is never replicated, forcing these guards to carry out an impossibly gruesome task.

Babur and Hunayun are bound by many rules – they aren’t allowed to turn around and look at the Taj Mahal, they must keep their sword raised and are forbidden to speak. To break these rules, as we discover from their conversation, could lead to harsh punishments, from being locked up for three days to death by elephant trampling.

However, even the threat of such consequences does not stop the impulsive chatter of Babur, played by Akkshey Caplash with such childlike enthusiasm that I immediately warmed to him. The other guard Humayun, played by Idam Sondhi, is the opposite of Babur. He is earnest and takes his job seriously, and we soon discover that he is the son of a senior military man. Humayun craves the approval of his father, has loyalty to his emperor, and believes in working hard to achieve rewards. It is perhaps, this tunnel view which will cast a shadow over both their futures.

Akkshey and Idam portray a strong friendship between the two characters. There are many moments of levity as well as philosophical conversation that takes place, showing a depth to their relationship. Akkshey’s Babur is a dreamer, creating and sharing ideas for his original inventions. Throughout the play, Idam’s Humayun loosens up and also shares his own creative invention. The two men are caged by their lower station and the rules of the more privileged, and their dreams and inventions signify their longing for being free. There was a theme of birds scattered throughout the play, and I found the links of freedom to these birds woven into the story cleverly significant.

 

Writer Rajiv Joseph, who was the 2016 winner of the Obie award for Best New American Play and also won the Lucille Lortel award for Best Play, has written an engaging script. Although there was no interval, there were two distinct parts, the turning point being the grim act the guards were forced to do by decree of the Emperor Shah Jahan. James Browne, the set and costume designer, created a daunting dungeon complete with underground water drainage.

Much like Babur and Humayun’s vast imaginings, I thought that there was intentional purpose to allow the audience to build their own images in their heads of some key scenes, guided by the set and stage lighting by lighting designer Kate Baldwin and composer and sound designer Me-Lee Hay.

This shone through in two particular scenes for me, with the first light morning unveiling of the Taj Mahal – where we didn’t see an image or a physical set of the beautiful building, but rather experienced it through the clever use of light and the actor’s reactions. The other stand out lighting and sound scene had explosions of red splashed on stage, and a rhythmical harsh slice sound amongst a frantic soundscape which signified one of the key horrifying moments in the play. This scene was gripping, and there was no need to show the actual visuals of what was happening, as we could see it in our mind. I noticed one audience member had their hands up to their mouth, clearly involved in the play.

Guards at the Taj, skilfully directed by Bali Padda again, two years after his directorial debut of the same play, is on tour throughout Australia throughout September and October 2024. This review was from the performance at the Riverside Theatre in Parramatta on the 12th September 2024.

Guards at the Taj is a confronting and beautifully scripted and acted play which will make you want to delve a little deeper into finding out whether or not this was based on a true story. Go see it, wherever it is playing around Australia!

Running time: 90 minutes, no interval.
Tickets from $59
www.riversideparramatta.com.au/whats-on/guards-at-the-taj

Photography by Noni Carroll Photography

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Murder by the Book – A Delightfully Dark Murder Mystery

Murder by the Book

Murder by the Book Rating

Click if you liked this article

1

A well thought out murder has always been the premise for a juicy plot. A traditional whodunnit which has red herrings and hidden clues, complete with an eccentric detective. This is what the main character, author and critic Selwyn, excels at with his best selling novels. We begin the play being introduced to the self inflated, egotistical Selwn, played with relish by Ross Alexander wearing a sports coat, a pocket handkerchief and a fancy silk neckerchief scarf – a nice touch by the costume designer Cettina Lahiri to convey the success of his career.

Selwyn and his assistant Christine, played by Fabiola Pellegrino, are discussing his latest review of a rival’s novel, which he essentially deems as rubbish and takes great delight in taking it apart! The dripping venom and confidence in Selwyn’s words is a key factor in this story as he is someone who likes to be in charge; to lead the story.

When something happens to Selwyn, the next door neighbour Peter Fletcher guides us through his own theories of what he thinks has led up to this murder. Rawdon Waller, as Peter Fletcher, gives us a delightful performance as the amateur sleuth, who excitedly tries to solve the mystery. Dressed flamboyantly in a fancy dressing gown, he is a fan of Selwyn’s murder mystery novels and Rawdon’s portrayal of Peter’s enthusiasm for being in a real life murder mystery was very amusing. His lines and physical comedy had the audience laughing many times over.

 

There are the ‘usual suspects’ in this story – Christine the devoted secretary, Imogen the wife who wants a divorce, and the publisher, who also happens to be Imogen’s lover, John. When faced with accusations, Brian May’s John appears helplessly out of his depth and this is communicated in both action and speech in a way which made me laugh and feel sorry for the poor man.

Imogen, played by Julie Mathers, was sassy and confident, complete with big hair and an 80’s sequinned top. Julie Mathers and Ross Alexander had their characters at the top of their form in a believable love/ hate marriage relationship. They were arguing, throwing insults and pointed remarks at each other and quickly bouncing back for more. It was a like watching a succinct tennis match with clever and witty dialogue as the ball.

The play, written by Duncan Greenwood and Robert King, had its strength in the script which was full of dark one liners and clever twists and turns. It was quite a wordy play, but the Hunters Hill Theatre’s strong cast, led by director Margaret Olive, didn’t let Murder by the Book drag.

The setting of 1980’s London meant we had a living room on stage with a traditional rolled armed couch, a wooden writing desk, record player (which was used to musically enhance a scene) typewriter and a dial handset telephone. These props by Coralie Fraser all added to the authenticity of the era. Wayne Chee’s set design ensured the living room had an open and spacious feel, where the audience could view the actors clearly. I noticed that there was a clever addition of something behind the couch which I won’t give away, would have made Selwyn feel more comfortable for some of the scenes!

If you are a fan of the clever whodunnit genre, come along to see the Hunters Hill Theatre’s performance of Murder by the Book. You’ll be guessing the Who, What, Why all throughout the play, not just at the end!

Running Time: Two hours, including a 20 minutes interval

Season: 7 -31 September 2024
Hunters Hill Theatre at Club Ryde
728 Victoria Rd, Ryde
Tickets from $32

www.huntershilltheatre.com.au

Photographer: Kris Egan

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Keep Moving Forward Along the Sweet Road

Sweet Road

Sweet Road Rating

Click if you liked this article

8

Come along for the ride into the Australian outback with Pymble Players’ Sweet Road. Literary award-winning playwright and scriptwriter Debra Oswald describes her play as a “road movie on stage” and directors Leah White and Rob White have successfully incorporated the stories of multiple characters to create this feel.

A strong part of the production that wove the story together as a quintessential Australian play was the sound design and soundscapes by Wayne Chee. Whether it be cicadas accompanying the stars, or the snippets of meaningful lyrics from Aussie song artists such as James Reyne’s “Reckless”, INXS’s “New Sensation” and Crowded House’s “Better Be Home Soon”, the song choice brought the audience into Australia’s heart.

With the recurring theme of being on the road, six characters revolve around each other, their lives intersecting during a time when they’re moving through stressful periods. Some characters are travellers by choice, others find themselves unexpectedly in front of the wheel heading somewhere else.

Jo (Tonia Davis) leads the opening scene as she narrates how she found herself hitting the road solo after witnessing a life changing incident. Tonia Davis portrays her character’s growth well, from being scattered to feeling whole again. Jo comes across teenage hitchhiker Yasmin (Ome Wu) who is on the way to being reunited with her boyfriend who is up north. Ome Wu successfully captured the high spirited buoyancy of youth in her character which made me smile. I felt that the young naive love struck Yasmin had a lesson to learn in this play, and when she returned in the second act, her storyline confirmed this.

Michael (Nick Roberts) has a job which takes him away from home, restocking soft drink vendor machines. He’s always moving around, never in one place for long and far away in kilometres and mind from his previous life; he’s running away. Michael’s story is tragic, and Nick Robert’s depiction of his character’s depth is admirable.

The fourth lone traveller is Frank (Murray Fane). We meet affable Frank at the caravan park, sitting contentedly on his camping chair, listening to his transistor radio. Frank is what Aussie’s term a ‘grey nomad’ traveller, and Frank’s story is touching and elicits empathy from the audience.

The only couple in Sweet Road are played by Chloe Callow as Carla and Dimitri Armatas as Andy. Married with two children and a dog (unseen but all three spoken frequently to – so the audience can imagine their little personalities), they are heaped inside an unreliable car, relocating to a potential job (not for the first time) that Andy is hoping to get. Andy is clearly hyperactive, bouncing with chatter, big dreams and even bigger positivity whilst Carla is the opposite. At first, we view Carla as a pessimist, stressed and uptight. As their story unfolds, I began to understand her frustration to Andy’s promises and subsequent disappointments and relate to why Carla was this way. Both Chloe Callow and Dimitri Armatas brought their characters to life with strong portrayals of their characters. With Carla carrying her daughter’s tiny Hello Kitty backpack, I hoped that this road trip would not be their last.

Jordan Andrews played 5 characters, each an integral supporting part of the story. Diverse roles such as The Policeman brought some laughs with his interaction with Carla and as Curtis, the hitchhiker, he brought tension and drama to the stage.

The set design by Rob and Leah White was minimal, but effective in combination with the lighting and projections by Wayne Chee. With some scenes being set in country servos (petrol stations), a caravan park and on the road, the wide open spaces of the Australian highways and towns were translated onto the stage with projections. Many scenes were set with the characters sitting in their car seats, miming steering. A standout with the lighting design were these scenes. When they were driving, we would know that they were on the road, with headlight beams showing the passing steady stream of cars and traffic light colours illuminating their drive. Some scenes where characters remained onstage but not lit, to show they were not on, whilst other scenes took place were masterfully done by all.

Due to the script, the first act was dialogue heavy and if the second act was similar, the play may have dragged. However, when drama occurs in the second act, it is here where the play comes together. The first act was needed to set up the characters’ stories in preparation.

Being on the road for everyone is a journey – you are travelling either towards or away from something. These characters’ lives intertwining, show the bones of humanity and the ripples of love, grief and acceptance. For some, what Sweet Road illuminates is that there is beauty in the freedom of the open road, but also for others it provides a safe space.

The Pymble Player’s Theatre have created an emotive play which many people will be able to relate to, from the young starry eyed teenager to the grey nomads amongst us – it’s a journey not to be missed.

Running Time: Two hours and 20 minutes, including a 20 minutes interval.

Season: 7-31 August 2024
Pymble Players Theatre
55A Mona Vale Road, entrance via Bromley Ave

https://pymbleplayers.com.au/sweet-road

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Home, I’m Darling: Pastel Paradise or Prison?

Home, I’m Darling Rating

Click if you liked this article

5

Laura Wade’s Olivier Award-winning comedy Home, I’m Darling is simply spiffy!

After finding herself newly free from a high powered job, Judy (Amelia Conway) and her husband Johnny (Daniel Ferris) jointly make a decision to create their own ‘happy place’ – a 1950’s home where Judy revels in keeping a spotless house and greeting her trilby wearing husband at the door with a cocktail and a smile.

Joy Sweeney’s set design of the couple’s living room and pastel paradise kitchen, complete with 50’s everything was charmingly inviting. Kudos to Luke Wallyn, for set construction and to the 12 set builders who were able to make the stage look spacious. The front door being elevated along the back end stage so that the audience could clearly see the entry and exit of characters was a good design; split levels in homes were common at the time.

The opening scene, complete with the gingham wallpaper, white lace billowy kitchen window curtains, boxy lavender refrigerator and oven were tied together to create a fresh background as Judy serves Johnny his toast, tea and eggs. They smile sweetly at each other, bantering about how, as Johnny says, they are “sickeningly happy”, showing their perfect smiles to the audience.

I can almost see them on a television toothpaste advertisement with a ‘Ting’ sound effect, and a bright sparkle appears on Johnny’s tooth when he winks at the audience. This play begins not dissimilar to a sitcom, complete with upbeat 1950’s music that reminds me of Samantha and Darren in Bewitched. Sound design music by Geoff Young and Charlotte Wiltshire were spot on throughout the duration of the play, echoing the character’s moods and expanding the play’s authenticity.

Early on, the audience is first introduced to the fact that this play is not actually set in the 1950’s, but is indeed a created make-believe 1950’s house. When Judy pulls out a laptop from the cupboard after Johnny goes to work, combined later with the loud, sharp and demanding incoming text message sounds from Johnny’s boss Alex’s (Vanessa Merewether) mobile, these modern technologies are completely incongruous with the house’s styling and feels foreign. These instances were lighter and original moments, which the audience appreciated.

Judy and Johnny’s initial wonderfully flowing 1950’s arrangement, told in 2 Acts, unspools as supporting characters enter, and questions are raised as to whether living and abiding by the rules is truely sustainable in the modern world.

Judy’s hippie-looking single mum Sylvia, played by Maxine Appel Cohen, performs a scene stealer with her impassioned speech to Judy and her stylist friend Fran (Cassandra Gorman). She cannot understand why her daughter has chosen to live as a fantasist in a world she has not actually lived through. Judy, (a self confessed Daddy’s girl), is made to listen as her mum talks about how hard she and other women fought to empower women back then, whilst she and other women had to sit quietly with their mouths silenced, turning a blind eye, as their husbands cheated on them.

She continues how the 1950’s were a time where “they were shit for anyone who wasn’t a straight white man”. This powerful speech was truely effective in bringing the audience into a time post-war, where men were number one and women were considered less respected. Sylvia’s realistic interpretation of how women existed to serve their husbands dinner with a smile and lay out their slippers differed from the romanticised version of her daughter.

Amelia Conway skilfully portrayed Judy as the perfect 1950’s domestic goddess housewife, whose flouncy beautiful skirts expanded as she twirled, much like how her smiles fanned out – despite the ongoing financial hardships that she would be forced to confront with Johnny. I noted that amongst all the serving of food, (Judy was a great hostess- preparing devilled eggs and the perfect chocolate cake) whenever her guests or husband ate, Judy did not touch her food. I wondered if this was her character being the polite housewife who didn’t want to gain weight by eating, to “keep her figure trim”? Or if it was not considered polite to eat with her husband, maybe she had to eat afterwards in her version of this world?

Daniel Ferris’ portrayal of Johnny’s unease with the couple’s commitment to the fantasy life of their expected 1950’s roles was excellent. Growing more and more uncomfortable with the stress of him being the sole breadwinner leads to a feeling of being trapped and imprisoned.

Under the direction of Joy Sweeney, Home, I’m Darling incorporates a tightly put together performance which combines the drama of societal expectations of gender roles, misogynistic behaviour in the workplace that happens even now (showed in a scene by Fran’s husband Marcus, played with slimy ickiness by David Eisenhauer) and the question of ever-changing shifts in marriage. Judy’s ‘Who Am I without the 1950’s housewife role’ is inextricably tied to her identity and she and Johnny must learn that if they want their marriage to thrive, a compromise must be sought – together.

This is a thought provoking play which which left me with visions of Judy’s beautiful 1950’s dresses, and an interesting nostalgic feeling, albeit just like Judy, of a picture perfect 1950’s home complete with dial telephones and Formica kitchen bench tops, even though I have never lived it.
Life would certainly have been different then.

Home, I’m Darling is playing at The Theatre on Chester, Chester St Epping

Running Time: 2 hours, including 20 minutes interval
26 July – 17 August 2024
Tickets $30 concession / $35 full

www.theatreonchester.com.au/home-im-darling

This review also appears on It’s On The House. Check out more reviews at Whats The Show to see what else is on in your town.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!