Jane “Meta” Austen

The Watsons

The Watsons Rating

Click if you liked this article

2

This is not your typical Jane Austen show. This is meta chaos.

Act I is what you would expect from anything attached to Jane Austen and the regency era; talks of marriage for both love and gain, a ball (complete with dance), proper introductions being made, and fast proposals. But what happens when the author inserts herself into the story and the characters rebel? Act II is a chaotic ride answering just that … and then some.

Please note I am calling the actors and actresses “performers” to avoid any unintentional mis-gendering.

The theatre boasts 120 seats, and at the time of the show starting, I could only spot four empty seats in the U-shaped space. This meant there were plenty of people to distract a performer as they laughed at the well-timed, well-delivered jokes. But the performers were professional, and each of them lost within the scene, not appearing to ever notice the loud, or occasionally scattered, laughter.

The stage was deep, but it was not of a typical size or shape. Performers were sometimes standing less than a metre in front of the front row audience, providing an immersive experience for all involved. This U-shape was paired with a second-storey balcony stage, only a few metres deep and appearing as part of the stage structure if you didn’t know any better. The few rows of stairs and the walkways surrounding the seating area were included as part of the stage a few times. Personally, I wish they could’ve had more opportunities from the script to use the walkways and stairs; the creative use elevated and enhanced the experience.

 

 

Being U-shaped was also a downfall for the performers. It can be challenging enough for a performer on stage not to turn their back on the audience, but in this instance, it often couldn’t be helped. Parts of the audience missed out on the comical reactions, the subtle and not-so-subtle facial expressions, and even important prop sightings. It was infrequent, but some moments were stagnant, with performers seeming to forget half the audience was behind them (yes, this did happen on purpose a few times, and it was well blocked for those particular scenes), and I could see audience members straining to spot the speaker. The first interaction between the author, Laura, and our lead, Emma, was alive and energetic, covering the stage and including everyone around them. Understandably, there’s only so much you can do with a space such as this one, and this was the only downfall of the performance that this author noticed. I feel it is important to note that even if the performer’s back was turned, at no point did I struggle to hear or understand what was being said; every performer had a clear voice and pronunciation, even if their characters ran their words together.

In saying that, the cast acted and reacted with and to one another spectacularly. If there were a crowd in the background they brought the foreground scene to life with murmurings, rustles, and reactions to the main speaker. Carefully choreographed scenes were executed so in sync that it seemed natural. They brought not only spoken comedy, but also a varying amount of slapstick and physical comedy to keep the audience on their metaphorical toes.

Helping to keep the audience on their toes were the set changes. While each set was minimalist, stagehands weren’t the ones changing the sets; rather, the performers were. While this was done well, and background noise over the speakers guided the audience into a scene change, some scenes changed so rapidly that it took a moment to catch up. While this worked with the script, when you aren’t expecting it to happen in this style, it can be jarring to begin with. The lighting is perfect for the story, and has few large changes, aside from some spotlights and some coloured choices in the second act, but does little to guide the audience through a set change. As an audience member, we must remember that while Jane Austen would never allow a well-bred member of society to carry their own chair, the meta version of these characters certainly don’t mind.

The costumes were beautifully regency era, and aside from the Redcoats, each character was sporting different colours and accessories to stand out to the crowd. If you aren’t familiar with the characters these costumes were incredibly helpful in keeping up with who was who. There were minimal costume changes, but the big ones that weren’t pointed out by the performers felt like easter eggs for the audience … one or two of the dresses even had pockets! The costumes represented the social standing of each character with elegance, tassels, careful embroidery, and well-chosen shoes.

 

As for the characters … I am hesitant to say too much and risk ruining anything for the readers. Be prepared to laugh, gasp, sigh, and maybe get a little teary. See the Watson family, in real time, lose some, win some, become appalled, find love, and even lust. Observe the Osborne family derail themselves to become the more interesting, more fulfilling versions of themselves. See side characters take a stand to be more involved in the story, or demand they get to grow and learn their endings; watch a cad find his way in the world; find out that the Redcoats have names; and try to spot Nanny polishing silverware for almost an entire scene.

In summary, everything has been thought of to reflect the (multiple) existential crises happening before you. I found each performer to be captivating, without stealing the spotlight from other cast members – even with some of those spectacular sideburns. Act II has more modern vernacular and is slightly crude (there are content warnings in the programs you can purchase at the ticket booth), but is tastefully done, for the most part. This is meta, this is fourth wall breaking, this is not always polite society, but it is laughing at itself and having fun.

I will say, I feel that one content warning is missing: If you are a writer, be prepared to potentially feel personally victimised by some of Laura’s lines about why writers write.

All in all, the performance begs you to find the answer to the question, “Is that very Jane Austen?”

To book tickets to The Watsons, please visit https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1324505.

Photographer: Richard Parkhill

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

The Old Maid, The Thief, The Telephone

The Old Maid, The Thief, The Telephone

The Old Maid, The Thief, The Telephone Rating

Click if you liked this article

1

Mopoke Theatre Productions, an Adelaide-based independent theatre company’s presentation of ‘The Old Maid and the Thief, and the Telephone’, is light-hearted and entertaining.

The show opens with The Telephone, an amusing sketch about the hapless Ben (Nicholas Cannon), trying desperately to get a few moments undisturbed with his beautiful girlfriend Lucy (Jessica Mills) so he can propose to her. Awkwardly, Ben just cannot seem to get a word in because Lucy is constantly on the telephone gossiping with her friends. Running late to catch a train, every time Ben is about to nervously pop the question, the phone rings, and once again Lucy is happily chatting and gossiping with a friend on the other end of the annoying contraption. Finally, Ben decides the only solution is to leave the apartment and call Lucy on the telephone. This brilliant idea works, and Lucy is delighted to get the proposal and of course, says yes, making Ben a happy man.

It’s hard to imagine a funny comedy sketch as an opera, but that is what the Telephone is. Jessica (soprano) and Nicholas (Baritone) keep the banter moving with delightful humour, making the audience chuckle along the way.

Returning after twelve years, The Old Maid and the Thief was the first show from Mopoke Theatre Productions’ early beginnings. Laetitia (Jessica Mills) who works at the home of lonely spinster, Miss Todd (Catriona Barr), brings a charming stranger, Bob (Macintyre Howie-Reeves) into Miss Todds home. Bob, a drifter just passing through, infatuates Laetitia and so she persuades Miss Todd to let him stay.

The local gossip, Miss Pinkerton (Rachel McCall) pays a visit with disturbing news that an escaped prisoner, who’s description sounds very much like Bob, is at large somewhere in the area. Miss Todd, already under Bob’s charming spell, ignores the similarities, and lets Bob continue to laze around the house, taking advantage of Miss Todd’s hospitality.

To keep up with Bod’s appetite for liquor, Miss Todd and Laetitia begin stealing from the local liquor store, oddly making them thieves in the process. Miss Todd realises what she has done, embarrassed she confronts Bob and tells him to leave. Bob leaves with Laetitia, leaving Miss Todd alone, to face the consequence of what has happened.

The combined singing talent of Catriona Barr (mezzo soprano) Rachel McCall (mezzo soprano), Jessica Mills (Soprano) Macintyre Howie-Reeves (baritone) make this an enjoyable operatic experience.

Directors Nicholas Cannon and Macintyre Howie-Reeves, Musical Directors Sachiko Hidaka and Penelope Cashman, Set and Costume Designer James Nicholson and Lighting Designer and Technician Tom Hannagan work together to bring the fantastic production to life.

This is a great production, sung in English, and a good choice for first-time opera attendees. My daughter joined me for this production, and it was her first time at an opera, and she was surprised how much she enjoyed it. It’s exciting to watch a show that is locally produced, featuring local talent. A thoroughly enjoyable experience.

The State Opera Theatre at Netley is a suitable venue, well-suited for its purpose. Easy to access with plenty of parking spaces makes for a hassle free evening out.

To book tickets to The Old Maid, The Thief, The Telephone, please visit https://www.mopoketheatreproductions.com/the-telephone-the-old-maid-and-the-thief.

Photographer: Alex Craddock

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Shakespeare In Hollywood

Shakespeare In Hollywood

Shakespeare In Hollywood Rating

Click if you liked this article

1

“Playwright Ken Ludwig is to contemporary domestic stage comedy what Arthur Miller was to the dramatic theatre of his time.”— Contra Costa Times

The Adelaide Repertory Company brings Shakespeare to the masses with their latest production of Ken Ludwig’s Shakespeare in Hollywood.

Commissioned by the Royal Shakespeare Company, and winner of The Helen Hayes Award for Best New Play of the Year (the MacArthur Award), Shakespeare in Hollywood combines one of the bard’s greatest works with Hollywood royalty of the 30s and 40s

Set in1934, Shakespeare’s most famous fairies, Oberon and Puck, have magically appeared on the set of the Warner Brothers movie of A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Overcome by the glitz and glamour of show biz, the two are cast to play (who else?) themselves. With a little help from a magical flower, a blonde actress and a movie mogul, the results are hysterical.

Director Jude Hines is no stranger to comedy having directed the bitter sweet new version of Mother and Son last year and the highly successful Jersey Boys for Therry Theatre in 2024.

Hines has gathered a talented, highly enthusiastic cast of sixteen, many who play multiple roles. Her blocking is meticulous and the production is ‘slick’ with particularly well-rehearsed scene changes. Her knowledge of the 30s Hollywood period is detailed as is her knowledge of A Midsummer’s Night Dream; essential if they are to be seamlessly blended.

Her vision is enhanced by Gary Anderson’s set design dominated by a large tree that could have come straight out of Camelot or Brigadoon, Ian Barge’s lighting with its beautiful contrast of a brightly coloured fairydom complete with magical smoke, the more austere studio lighting and the striking downlights for the phone call scenes and Sandy Whitelaw’s evocative costumes. (special mention to Oberon’s crown by John Duval and Ushmo Prem and Bottom’s head by Aryahna Tyree).

 

 

Stephen Bill’s Oberon is everything we would want the king of the Fairies to be, mysterious and with immaculate diction. He is the lynch pin to the production and carries the mantle of leading actor with ease.

Emily Burns’ Puck is mischievous, bold, and a worthy accomplice to Oberon. I loved her repetitive exit line, straight from Shakespeare.

Ben Todd’s Jack Warner is suitably boisterous and demanding and a great foil to his assistant Daryl and Max Reinhardt. He commands the stage in all of his scenes.

Sam Wiseman’s Max Reinhardt reminds us of the conflict in Germany during the 30s and strikes more than a comparison to the current head of the USA. I loved his scenes with Will Hays.

Adam Schultz’s Will Hays is narrow minded, pedantic and the enemy of Hollywood film of the time. His scene when becoming the ass from Pyramus and Thisbe is hysterical.

Leah Lowe’s Olivia Darnell is a character we can all sympathise with, a young star who is uncertain of her talent. Her scenes when she falls in love with Oberon are moving.

Jasmine Duggan’s Lydia Lansing steals anything not nailed down with her over the top performance as the blond actor with more determination than talent. She is a pleasure to watch.

Penni Hamilton-Smith’s Louella Parsons is suitably loud and pushy all wrapped in gorgeous gowns.

Malcolm Watson nails every laugh as Joe E. Brown/Groucho Marx and Harry Warner. His version of Thisbe brought the house down.

The cast is completed by Kieran Drost as the bumbling Daryl, Matthew Thompson as Dick Powell, Tom Adams as Jimmy Cagney/Sam Warner, Nicholas Elborough as Tarzan/Albert Warner/ensemble and Mike Leach, Esther Burnett and Wendy Peecock making up the hard-working ensemble.

My only slight reservation with this fun-filled production is the length of some of the blackouts of which there are many. Devising some business to cover the changes would have kept the pace at a consistent level.

Shakespeare in Hollywood is a welcome escape from the woes of modern day and makes Shakespeare easy to understand for the novice. This is a large cast play and a credit to Jude Hines, her cast and crew and the Adelaide Repertory!

Photo Credit – Richard Parkhill

To book tickets to Shakespeare In Hollywood, please visit https://adelaiderep.com/season-2025/shakespeare-in-hollywood.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Frozen Jr

Review: Frozen Jr

Review: Frozen Jr Rating

Click if you liked this article

1

Based on the Academy Award winning Disney animated feature film, Frozen, the Adelaide Theatre Academy’s limited season of Frozen Jr at the Goodwood Institute, is a first-class vehicle to highlight the outstanding flourishing talents of the young cast in this highly entertaining production that brings Anna, Elsa and the crew alive on stage.

The plot develops in the Kingdom of Arendelle as Young Anna and Young Elsa play as summer is celebrated by the Townspeople. Young Anna pesters Young Elsa to use her magical powers to create snow and ice. Queen Iduna and King Agnarr prompt them that Young Elsa’s powers must be kept a secret. That night they build a toy snowman called Olaf, and Young Elsa inadvertently uses her powers resulting in Young Anna becoming unconscious. The King and Queen enlist the help of the Hidden Folk and their leaders Pabbie and Bulda revive Young Anna and remove the memory of Young Elsa’s powers from Young Anna’s head. Fearful of her potentially harmful magic, Young Elsa vows to hide her powers and removes herself from everyone including her sister.

The King and Queen travel away from the kingdom but are lost at sea and the sisters are isolated from the outside world and each other. Later Elsa is to be crowned Queen and for the Coronation the castle gates are opened after being shut for many years. Anna becomes excited with the prospect of having people back in the castle. Anna falls in love with Prince Hans and Elsa again loses control of her powers and flees, Anna tries to find her sister leaving Prince Hans in charge of Arendelle. In her search she encounters Kristoff and his reindeer Sven, then Olaf the talking snowman who all join her in her quest to find Elsa.

The show includes the favourite songs from the original film, “Let It Go” and “Do You Want to Build a Snowman?” as well as new songs for the stage.

 

 

With the limited confines of the Goodwood Institute and the large size of the cast, the set design is minimal, relying on a series of ladders that are moved throughout the show. While practical considerations are obviously in play in relation to the minimal set design, the minimalism may lead to confusion with the story amongst younger audience members of which there was a large number in the session reviewed. There were also minor sound issues but not enough to mar the show. Costumes are very good, however the stylised Olaf costume may again lead to confusion for younger audience members.

Two casts alternate between sessions, a “Winter Cast” and a ” Summer Cast”. The session reviewed was performed by the “Winter Cast”. The whole cast has impressive developing talent. They all performed to a remarkably excellent level considering their age and would all seem to have bright futures. Given the excellent performance of all the cast it seems unfair to single out individual members, but the leads Claire Wilkes as Anna and Lucy Parkes as Elsa, deserve special mention for outstanding achievements. Lucy’s singing voice is already at an accomplished level. Special scene stealing mention also to Olive Kennedy as Olaf.

The Adelaide Theatre Academy should be proud of their production of Frozen Jr as it highlights the brilliant developing talents of the cast in this charming take on Disney’s Frozen characters.

Frozen Jr runs to 19 July 2025; remaining session dates and times are as follows:

– Friday July 18th – 10:15am & 6:30pm
– Saturday July 19th – 11:00am & 6:30pm

To book tickets to Frozen Jr, please visit https://theatrebugs.com.au/theatre-bugs-shows-and-events/.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!